ArticleBMC surgery2021
Long-term follow-up of prophylactic mesh reinforcement after emergency laparotomy. A retrospective controlled study.
Article in BMC surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04578561 (Long-term Follow-up of Prophylactic Mesh Reinforcement After Emergency Laparotomy.), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Long-term Follow-up of Prophylactic Mesh Reinforcement After Emergency Laparotomy.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prophylactic mesh reinforcement at emergency midline laparotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis with pre-specified subgroup analysis of contaminated and dirty abdominal wounds (CDC Class III-IV).Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Prophylactic Mesh-related Reoperations and Mesh-related Problems During Subsequent Relaparotomies: Long-term Results From the PRIMA Trial.Annals of surgery · 2026Trial
- Review
- Safety and efficacy of prophylactic onlay resorbable synthetic mesh with a comprehensive wound bundle at laparotomy closure in high-risk emergency abdominal surgery: an observational study.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2025Observational
- The clinical consequences of burst abdomen after emergency midline laparotomy: a prospective, observational cohort study.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024Observational
- Case Report: Abdominal Wall Abscess as First Clinical Sign of Jejunal Perforation After Blunt Abdominal Trauma.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2024Article
- Incisional Hernia Depends on More Than Just Mesh Placement.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2024Article
- Defining High-Risk Patients Suitable for Incisional Hernia Prevention.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevention of incisional hernias with a prophylactic mesh in emergency surgery is controversial. The present study aimed to analyze the long-term results of prophylactic mesh used for preventing incisional hernia after emergency midline laparotomies.
methodsThis study was a registered (NCT04578561) retrospective analysis of patients who underwent an emergency midline laparotomy between January 2009 and July 2010 with a follow-up period of longer than 2 years. Long-term outcomes and risk factors for the development of incisional hernias between patients who received a prophylactic reinforcement mesh (Group M) and suture (Group S) were compared.
resultsFrom an initial 266 emergency midline laparotomies, 187 patients were included. The median follow-up time was 64.4 months (SD 35). Both groups had similar characteristics, except for a higher rate of previous operations (62 vs. 43.2%; P = 0.01) and operation due to a revision laparotomy (32.5 vs.13%; P = 0.02) in the M group. During follow-up, 29.9% of patients developed an incisional hernia (Group S 36.6% vs. Group M 14.3%; P = 0.002). Chronic mesh infections were diagnosed in 2 patients, but no mesh explants were needed, and no patient in the M group developed chronic pain. Long-term risk factors for incisional hernia were as follows: smoking (HR = 2.47; 95% CI 1.318-4.624; P = 0.05), contaminated surgery (HR = 2.98; 95% CI 1.142-7.8; P = 0.02), surgical site infection (SSI; HR = 3.83; 95% CI 1.86-7.86; P = 0.001), and no use of prophylactic mesh (HR = 5.09; 95% CI 2.1-12.2; P = 0.001).
conclusionIncidence of incisional hernias after emergency midline laparotomies is high and increases with time. High-risk patients, contaminated surgery, and surgical site infection (SSI) benefit from mesh reinforcement. Prophylactic mesh use is safe and feasible in emergencies with a low long-term complication rate.
trial registrationNCT04578561. www.clinicaltrials.gov.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.