ArticleBMC anesthesiology2021
ClearSight™ finger cuff versus invasive arterial pressure measurement in patients with body mass index above 45 kg/m
Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Accuracy and precision of continuous, non-invasive blood pressure devices: a systematic review and meta-analyses.Anaesthesia · 2026Pooled it
- Pearls and pitfalls of noninvasive continuous arterial blood pressure monitoring.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2026Article
- Comparison of the ClearSight™ finger cuff monitor versus invasive arterial blood pressure measurement in elective cardiac surgery patients: a prospective observational study.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2024Observational
- Smartphone-Based versus Non-Invasive Automatic Oscillometric Brachial Cuff Blood Pressure Measurements: A Prospective Method Comparison Volunteer Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Feasibility and Accuracy of Noninvasive Continuous Arterial Pressure Monitoring during Transcatheter Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Correction: ClearSight™ finger cuff versus invasive arterial pressure measurement in patients with body mass index above 45 kg/mBMC anesthesiology · 2023Article
- Comparison of oscillometric, non-invasive and invasive arterial pressure monitoring in patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery - a secondary analysis of a prospective observational study.BMC anesthesiology · 2022Observational
- The hidden cost of hypotension: redefining hemodynamic management to improve patient outcomes.Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMeasuring blood pressure in patients with obesity is challenging. The ClearSight™ finger cuff (FC) uses the vascular unloading technique to provide continuous non-invasive blood pressure measurements. We aimed to test the agreement of the FC with invasive radial arterial monitoring (INV) in patients with obesity.
methodsParticipants had a body mass index (BMI) ≥45 kg/m
resultsThe 30 participants had a median (IQR) BMI of 50.2 kg/m
conclusionsThe vascular unloading technique was not adequately in agreement with radial arterial monitoring. Evaluation in a larger sample is required before recommending this technique for intraoperative monitoring of patients with BMI ≥45 kg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.