Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34006023›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Association between preconception maternal stress and offspring birth weight: findings from an Australian longitudinal data linkage study.

Melissa L Harris, Alexis J Hure, Elizabeth Holliday, Catherine Chojenta, Amy E Anderson, Deborah Loxton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Melissa L HarrisCentre for Women's Health Research, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia melissa.harris@newcastle.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-5733-9684
Alexis J HureCentre for Women's Health Research, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Elizabeth HollidaySchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4066-6224
Catherine ChojentaCentre for Women's Health Research, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Amy E AndersonCentre for Women's Health Research, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Deborah LoxtonCentre for Women's Health Research, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveExamine the relationship between preconception stress and offspring birth weight.

settingPopulation-based cohort study linked with state-based administrative perinatal data.

participants6100 births from 3622 women from the 1973-1978 cohort of the Australian Longitudinal Study of Women's Health who (1) recorded a singleton birth between January 1997 and December 2011; (2) returned at least one follow-up survey within 3 years of conception; and (3) had complete data on perceived stress prior to conception. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Linear generalised estimating equations were used to examine the relationship between preconception stress and a continuous measure of birth weight, exploring differences based on birth order and stress chronicity. The minimal sufficient adjustment set of covariates was determined by a directed acyclic graph.

resultsFor all births, there was no relationship between moderate/high acute or chronic stress and offspring birth weight in grams. Among first births only, there was a trend towards a relationship between moderate/high chronic stress and offspring birth weight. Offspring sex was associated with birth weight in all models, with female babies born lighter than male babies on average, after adjusting for covariates (p<0.0001).

conclusionsEffects of preconception stress on birth weight was largely driven by time to conception. With the timing of stress critical to its impact on obstetrical outcomes, preconception care should involve not only reproductive life planning but the space to provide interventions at critical periods so that optimal outcomes are achieved.

Indexed as

Information Storage and RetrievalAustraliaBirth WeightCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalePregnancyepidemiologymental healthpreventive medicinepublic health

Identifiers

PMID34006023
PMCPMC7942266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.