Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34004452›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of hygiene and environmental health2021

Kenyan school book knowledge for water, sanitation, hygiene and health education interventions: Disconnect, integration or opportunities?

Carmen Anthonj, Sophie Githinji, Christoph Höser, Alfred Stein, Justine Blanford, Valentina Grossi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of hygiene and environmental health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Carmen AnthonjFaculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, ITC, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands; Institute for Hygiene and Public Health, Medical Faculty, University of Bonn, GeoHealth Centre, Bonn, Germany. Electronic address: c.anthonj@utwente.nl.
Sophie GithinjiIndependent Consultant, Nairobi, Kenya. Electronic address: sophiegithinji@gmail.com.
Christoph HöserInstitute for Hygiene and Public Health, Medical Faculty, University of Bonn, GeoHealth Centre, Bonn, Germany. Electronic address: christoph.hoeser@ukbonn.de.
Alfred SteinFaculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, ITC, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands. Electronic address: a.stein@utwente.nl.
Justine BlanfordFaculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, ITC, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands. Electronic address: j.i.blanford@utwente.nl.
Valentina GrossiInstitute for Hygiene and Public Health, Medical Faculty, University of Bonn, GeoHealth Centre, Bonn, Germany. Electronic address: valentina.grossi@ukbonn.de.
University of Bonn · DEUniversity of Twente · NLAfrican Conservation Centre · KE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSchools, depending on their access to and quality of water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) and the implementation of healthy behaviours, can be critical for the control and spread of many infectious diseases, including COVID-19. Schools provide opportunities for pupils to learn about the importance of hygiene and WASH-related practice, and build healthy habits and skills, with beneficial medium- and long-term consequences particularly in low- and middle-income countries: reducing pupils' absenteeism due to diseases, promoting physical, mental and social health, and improving learning outcomes. WASH services alone are often not sufficient and need to be combined with educational programmes. As pupils disseminate their acquired health-promoting knowledge to their (extended) families, improved WASH provisions and education in schools have beneficial effects also on the community. International organisations frequently roll out interventions in schools to improve WASH services and, in some cases, train pupils and teachers on safe WASH behaviours. How such interventions relate to local school education on WASH, health promotion and disease prevention knowledge, whether and how such knowledge and school books are integrated into WASH education interventions in schools, are knowledge gaps we fill.

methodsWe analyzed how Kenyan primary school science text book content supports WASH and health education by a book review including books used from class 1 through class 8, covering the age range from 6 to 13 years. We then conducted a rapid literature review of combined WASH interventions that included a behaviour change or educational component, and a rapid review of international policy guidance documents to contextualise the results and understand the relevance of books and school education for WASH interventions implemented by international organisations. We conducted a content analysis based on five identified thematic categories, including drinking water, sanitation, hygiene, environmental hygiene & health promotion and disease risks, and mapped over time the knowledge about WASH and disease prevention.

resultsThe books comprehensively address drinking water issues, including sources, quality, treatment, safe storage and water conservation; risks and transmission pathways of various waterborne (Cholera, Typhoid fever), water-based (Bilharzia), vector-related (Malaria) and other communicable diseases (Tuberculosis); and the importance of environmental hygiene and health promotion. The content is broadly in line with internationally recommended WASH topics and learning objectives. Gaps remain on personal hygiene and handwashing, including menstrual hygiene, sanitation education, and related health risks and disease exposures. The depth of content varies greatly over time and across the different classes. Such locally available education materials already used in schools were considered by none of the WASH education interventions in the considered intervention studies.

conclusionsThe thematic gaps/under-representations in books that we identified, namely sanitation, hygiene and menstrual hygiene education, are all high on the international WASH agenda, and need to be filled especially now, in the context of the current COVID-19 pandemic. Disconnects exist between school book knowledge and WASH education interventions, between policy and implementation, and between theory and practice, revealing missed opportunities for effective and sustainable behaviour change, and underlining the need for better integration. Considering existing local educational materials and knowledge may facilitate the buy-in and involvement of teachers and school managers in strengthening education and implementing improvements. We suggest opportunities for future research, behaviour change interventions and decision-making to improve WASH in schools.

Indexed as

Health EducationAdolescentChildCommunicable Disease ControlCommunicable DiseasesCurriculumDrinking WaterHand DisinfectionHealth BehaviorHealth PromotionHumansHygieneKenyaSanitationSchoolsTextbooks as TopicDrinking WaterBehaviour changeCurriculumEducationHealth promotionSub-Saharan AfricaWASH

Identifiers

PMID34004452
PMCPMC9760049
OpenAlexW3161953552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.