Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34004135›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2021

Food discovery is associated with different reliance on social learning and lower cognitive flexibility across environments in a food-caching bird.

Virginia K Heinen, Angela M Pitera, Benjamin R Sonnenberg, Lauren M Benedict, Eli S Bridge, Damien R Farine, Vladimir V Pravosudov

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Spatial memory obviates following behaviour in an information centre of wild fruit bats.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Virginia K HeinenDepartment of Biology, University of Nevada Reno, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
Angela M PiteraDepartment of Biology, University of Nevada Reno, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
Benjamin R SonnenbergDepartment of Biology, University of Nevada Reno, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
Lauren M BenedictDepartment of Biology, University of Nevada Reno, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
Eli S BridgeOklahoma Biological Survey, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA.
Damien R FarineDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
Vladimir V PravosudovDepartment of Biology, University of Nevada Reno, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
University of Nevada, Reno · USOklahoma Biological Survey · USUniversity of Konstanz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social learning is a primary mechanism for information acquisition in social species. Despite many benefits, social learning may be disadvantageous when independent learning is more efficient. For example, searching independently may be more advantageous when food sources are ephemeral and unpredictable. Individual differences in cognitive abilities can also be expected to influence social information use. Specifically, better spatial memory can make a given environment more predictable for an individual by allowing it to better track food sources. We investigated how resident food-caching chickadees discovered multiple novel food sources in both harsher, less predictable high elevation and milder, more predictable low elevation winter environments. Chickadees at high elevation were faster at discovering multiple novel food sources and discovered more food sources than birds at low elevation. While birds at both elevations used social information, the contribution of social learning to food discovery was significantly lower at high elevation. At both elevations, chickadees with better spatial cognitive flexibility were slower at discovering food sources, likely because birds with lower spatial cognitive flexibility are worse at tracking natural resources and therefore spend more time exploring. Overall, our study supported the prediction that harsh environments should favour less reliance on social learning.

Indexed as

Social LearningSongbirdsAnimalsCognitionFeeding BehaviorFoodfood-cachingfood discoveryharsh environmentsocial learningsocial networksspatial cognition

Identifiers

PMID34004135
PMCPMC8131126
OpenAlexW3160466901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.