Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34004024›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2021

Geophagia and risk of squamous cell esophageal cancer in the African esophageal cancer corridor: Findings from the ESCCAPE multicountry case-control studies.

Clement T Narh, Charles P Dzamalala, Blandina T Mmbaga, Diana Menya, Yohannie Mlombe, Peter Finch, Gissela Nyakunga, Joachim Schüz, Valerie McCormack, ESCCAPE team

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Clement T NarhBranch of Environment and Lifestyle Epidemiology, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4025-5433
Charles P DzamalalaCollege of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
Blandina T MmbagaKilimanjaro Clinical Research Institute, Moshi, Tanzania.
Diana MenyaSchool of Public Heath, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya.
Yohannie MlombeCollege of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
Peter FinchCollege of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
Gissela NyakungaKilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania.
Joachim SchüzBranch of Environment and Lifestyle Epidemiology, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France.
Valerie McCormackBranch of Environment and Lifestyle Epidemiology, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7397-3442
ESCCAPE team
University of Malawi · MWCentre international de recherche sur le cancer · FRKilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre · TZMoi University · KEUniversity of Health and Allied Sciences · GH

Funding

Esophageal cancer in West KenyaR21CA191965 · NCI · INTERNATIONAL AGENCY FOR RES ON CANCER · PI MCCORMACK, VALERIE · 2015 to 2016
$256k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA191965World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Geophagia, the intentional practice of consuming soil, occurs across the African esophageal cancer corridor, particularly during pregnancy. We investigated whether this practice is linked to endemic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in this region. We conducted ESCC case-control studies in Tanzania, Malawi and Kenya. Cases were patients with incident histologically/clinically confirmed ESCC and controls were hospital patients/visitors without digestive diseases. Participants were asked if they had ever eaten soil (never/regularly/pregnancy-only). Odds ratios (OR) are adjusted for sex, age, tobacco, alcohol, country, religion and marital status. Overall, 934 cases (Malawi 535, Tanzania 304 and Kenya females 95) and 995 controls provided geophagia information. Among controls, ever-geophagia was common in women (Malawi 49%, Kenya 43% and Tanzania 29%) but not in men (10% Malawi, <1% Tanzania). In women, ESCC ORs were 1.25 (95% CI: 0.70, 2.22) for regular versus never geophagia and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.64, 1.22) for pregnancy-only versus never. Findings were stronger based on comparisons of cases with hospital visitor controls and were null using hospital patients as controls. In conclusion, geophagia is too rare to contribute to the male ESCC burden in Africa. In women, the practice is common but we did not find consistent evidence of a link to ESCC. The study cannot rule out selection bias masking modest effects. Physical effects of geophagia do not appear to have a large impact on overall ESCC risk. Research with improved constituent-based geophagia exposure assessment is needed.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCase-Control StudiesEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaFemaleHumansKenyaMalawiMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioPicaPregnancyTanzaniaAfricacancer epidemiologyesophageal squamous cell carcinomageophagiarisk factors

Identifiers

PMID34004024
PMCPMC8411422
OpenAlexW3163295869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.