ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2021
Can the Macula be Attached if View Is Obscured by a Bullous Retinal Detachment? A Mathematical Consideration.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine if it is possible for the macula to remain attached if a bullous retinal detachment blocks the examiner's view to the macula. Methods: A mathematical analysis compared the arc length of the attached retina versus the length of a detached retina necessary to obscure the macula (hang over the visual axis). The shape (oblate ellipsoid) and dimensions of the retina were based on a published study. The complete path of the hanging retina was calculated as a static catenary so as to depict the lowest possible position ("worst case scenario"). Results: The measured and calculated angle between the fovea and ora serrata was 105 degrees. When considering a catenary shape of the hanging retina, the macula could, mathematically, still be attached despite the retina hanging down 1.03 mm below the visual axis for an emmetropic eye. The maximal distance calculated was 1.095 mm for a -12 diopter (D) myopic eye. Conclusions: If the macular center cannot be viewed due to a bullous superior retinal detachment hanging into the examiner's view, it is unlikely but possible that the macula remains attached. If the view is obscured by at least 1 mm below the fovea, it is not mathematically possible for the fovea to be attached. Translational Relevance: The status of the macula being detached is subject to mathematical constraints, which, explored herein, offer a higher certainty of clinical decision making that could inform management for better clinical results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.