ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2021
Estimating Ganglion Cell Complex Rates of Change With Bayesian Hierarchical Models.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Artificial Intelligence-Based Prognostic Model for Prediction of Functional Glaucoma Progression From Clinical and Structural Data.American journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- A Bayesian Hierarchical Longitudinal Model for Estimation of Central Visual Field Rates of Change in Glaucoma.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- A SPATIALLY VARYING HIERARCHICAL RANDOM EFFECTS MODEL FOR LONGITUDINAL MACULAR STRUCTURAL DATA IN GLAUCOMA PATIENTS.The annals of applied statistics · 2024Article
- Detection of glaucoma progression on longitudinal series of en-face macular optical coherence tomography angiography images with a deep learning model.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2024Observational
- A Bayesian Hierarchical Spatial Longitudinal Model Improves Estimation of Local Macular Rates of Change in Glaucomatous Eyes.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Comparison of Ganglion Cell Layer and Inner Plexiform Layer Rates of Change in Suspected and Established Glaucoma.American journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence to Aid Glaucoma Diagnosis and Monitoring: State of the Art and New Directions.Photonics · 2022Article
- Multivariate Longitudinal Modeling of Macular Ganglion Cell Complex: Spatiotemporal Correlations and Patterns of Longitudinal Change.Ophthalmology science · 2022Article
- Ganglion Cell Complex: The Optimal Measure for Detection of Structural Progression in the Macula.American journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
- A Joint Bayesian Longitudinal Model for Macular Structure-Function Correlations in Glaucoma.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
- Association of Blood Pressure and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Rates of Thinning in Patients with Moderate to Advanced Glaucoma.Ophthalmology. GlaucomaArticle
- Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Rates of Change: Comparison of 2 OCT Devices.Ophthalmology. GlaucomaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Develop a hierarchical longitudinal regression model for estimating local rates of change of macular ganglion cell complex (GCC) measurements with optical coherence tomography (OCT). Methods: We enrolled 112 eyes with four or more macular OCT images and ≥2 years of follow-up. GCC thickness measurements within central 6 × 6 superpixels were extracted from macular volume scans. We fit data from each superpixel separately with several hierarchical Bayesian random-effects models. Models were compared with the Watanabe-Akaike information criterion. For our preferred model, we estimated population and individual slopes and intercepts (baseline thickness) and their correlation. Results: Mean (SD) follow-up time and median (interquartile range) baseline 24-2 visual field mean deviation were 3.6 (0.4) years and -6.8 (-12.2 to -4.3) dB, respectively. The random intercepts and slopes model with random residual variance was the preferred model. While more individual and population negative slopes were observed in the paracentral and papillomacular superpixels, superpixels in the superotemporal and inferior regions displayed the highest correlation between baseline thickness and rates of change (r = -0.43 to -0.50 for the top five correlations). Conclusions: A Bayesian linear hierarchical model with random intercepts/slopes and random variances is an optimal initial model for estimating GCC slopes at population and individual levels. This novel model is an efficient method for estimating macular rates of change and probability of glaucoma progression locally. Translational Relevance: The proposed Bayesian hierarchical model can be applied to various macular outcomes from different OCT devices and to superpixels of variable sizes to estimate local rates of change and progression probability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.