ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2021
Strategies to Improve Convolutional Neural Network Generalizability and Reference Standards for Glaucoma Detection From OCT Scans.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in glaucoma: opportunities, challenges, and future directions.Biomedical engineering online · 2023Pooled it
- Deep learning and optical coherence tomography in glaucoma: Bridging the diagnostic gap on structural imaging.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2022Pooled it
- Explainable Multimodal OCT and OCTA Analysis Reveals Structural and Vascular Features of Mild Glaucoma Across Ethnicities.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Observational
- Current status and solutions for AI ethics in ophthalmology: a bibliometric analysis.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- A Deep Learning Model for Glaucoma Detection Outperforms Conventional Metrics.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- OCT-based diagnosis of glaucoma and glaucoma stages using explainable machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Are Macula or Optic Nerve Head Structures Better at Diagnosing Glaucoma? An Answer Using Artificial Intelligence and Wide-Field Optical Coherence Tomography.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Can Glaucoma Suspect Data Help to Improve the Performance of Glaucoma Diagnosis?Translational vision science & technology · 2023Article
- Generative adversarial network-based deep learning approach in classification of retinal conditions with optical coherence tomography images.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023Article
- The OCT RNFL Probability Map and Artifacts Resembling Glaucomatous Damage.Translational vision science & technology · 2022Article
- Robust and Interpretable Convolutional Neural Networks to Detect Glaucoma in Optical Coherence Tomography Images.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2021Article
- Advancing glaucoma detection with convolutional neural networks: a paradigm shift in ophthalmology.Romanian journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To develop and evaluate methods to improve the generalizability of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) trained to detect glaucoma from optical coherence tomography retinal nerve fiber layer probability maps, as well as optical coherence tomography circumpapillary disc (circle) b-scans, and to explore impact of reference standard (RS) on CNN accuracy. Methods: CNNs previously optimized for glaucoma detection from retinal nerve fiber layer probability maps, and newly developed CNNs adapted for glaucoma detection from optical coherence tomography b-scans, were evaluated on an unseen dataset (i.e., data collected at a different site). Multiple techniques were used to enhance CNN generalizability, including augmenting the training dataset, using multimodal input, and training with confidently rated images. Model performance was evaluated with different RS. Results: Training with data augmentation and training on confident images enhanced the accuracy of the CNNs for glaucoma detection on a new dataset by 5% to 9%. CNN performance was optimal when a similar RS was used to establish labels both for the training and the testing sets. However, interestingly, the CNNs described here were robust to variation in the RS. Conclusions: CNN generalizability can be improved with data augmentation, multiple input image modalities, and training on images with confident ratings. CNNs trained and tested with the same RS achieved best accuracy, suggesting that choosing a thorough and consistent RS for training and testing improves generalization to new datasets. Translational Relevance: Strategies for enhancing CNN generalizability and for choosing optimal RS should be standard practice for CNNs before their deployment for glaucoma detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.