ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2021
Low-Cost, Smartphone-Based Specular Imaging and Automated Analysis of the Corneal Endothelium.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Visualization of Ex Vivo Porcine Corneal Endothelial Cells Using Smartphone-Assisted Specular Reflection With Slit-Lamp Biomicroscopy.Veterinary ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Smartphone-based biosensing: a review of optical imaging, microfluidic integration, and AI-enhanced analysis.Mikrochimica acta · 2025Review
- Low-cost and convenient screening of disease using analysis of physical measurements and recordings.PLOS digital health · 2024Review
- Applications of Imaging Technologies in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy: A Narrative Literature Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- [Corneal endothelial cell photography: comparison of smartphones].Die Ophthalmologie · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Specular and confocal microscopes are important tools to monitor the health of the corneal endothelium (CE), but their high costs significantly limit accessibility in low-resource environments. We developed and validated a low-cost, fully automated method to quantitatively evaluate the CE using smartphone-based specular microscopy. Methods: A OnePlus 7 Pro smartphone attached to a Topcon SL-D701 slit-lamp was used to image the central corneal endothelium of 30 eyes using the specular reflection technique. A novel on-device image processing algorithm automatically computed endothelial cell density (ECD), percentage of hexagonal cells (HEX), and coefficient of variation (CV) values. These values were compared with the ECD, HEX, and CV generated by a Tomey EM-4000 specular microscope used to image the same set of eyes. Results: No significant differences were found in ECD (2799 ± 156 cells/mm2 vs. 2779 ± 166 cells/mm2; P = 0.28) and HEX (52 ± 6% vs. 53 ± 6%; P = 0.50) computed by smartphone-based specular imaging and specular microscope, respectively. A statistically significant difference in CV (34 ± 3% vs. 30 ± 3%; P < 0.01) was found between the two methods. The concordance achieved between the smartphone-based method and the Tomey specular microscope is very similar to the concordance between two specular microscopes reported in the literature. Conclusions: Smartphone-based specular imaging and automated analysis is a low-cost method to quantitatively evaluate the CE with accuracy comparable to the clinical standard. Translational Relevance: This tool can be used to screen the CE in low-resource regions and prompt investigation of suspected corneal endotheliopathies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.