Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34003981›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2021

Low-Cost, Smartphone-Based Specular Imaging and Automated Analysis of the Corneal Endothelium.

Sreekar Mantena, Jay Chandra, Eryk Pecyna, Andrew Zhang, Dominic Garrity, Stephan Ong Tone, Srinivas Sastry, Madhu Uddaraju, Ula V Jurkunas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sreekar MantenaHarvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Science, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Jay ChandraHarvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Science, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Eryk PecynaHarvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Science, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Andrew ZhangHarvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Science, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Dominic GarrityHarvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Science, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Stephan Ong ToneCornea Center of Excellence, Schepens Eye Research Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Srinivas SastryBethesda Retina, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Madhu UddarajuSri Kiran Institute of Ophthalmology, Kakinada, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Ula V JurkunasCornea Center of Excellence, Schepens Eye Research Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Specular and confocal microscopes are important tools to monitor the health of the corneal endothelium (CE), but their high costs significantly limit accessibility in low-resource environments. We developed and validated a low-cost, fully automated method to quantitatively evaluate the CE using smartphone-based specular microscopy. Methods: A OnePlus 7 Pro smartphone attached to a Topcon SL-D701 slit-lamp was used to image the central corneal endothelium of 30 eyes using the specular reflection technique. A novel on-device image processing algorithm automatically computed endothelial cell density (ECD), percentage of hexagonal cells (HEX), and coefficient of variation (CV) values. These values were compared with the ECD, HEX, and CV generated by a Tomey EM-4000 specular microscope used to image the same set of eyes. Results: No significant differences were found in ECD (2799 ± 156 cells/mm2 vs. 2779 ± 166 cells/mm2; P = 0.28) and HEX (52 ± 6% vs. 53 ± 6%; P = 0.50) computed by smartphone-based specular imaging and specular microscope, respectively. A statistically significant difference in CV (34 ± 3% vs. 30 ± 3%; P < 0.01) was found between the two methods. The concordance achieved between the smartphone-based method and the Tomey specular microscope is very similar to the concordance between two specular microscopes reported in the literature. Conclusions: Smartphone-based specular imaging and automated analysis is a low-cost method to quantitatively evaluate the CE with accuracy comparable to the clinical standard. Translational Relevance: This tool can be used to screen the CE in low-resource regions and prompt investigation of suspected corneal endotheliopathies.

Indexed as

Endothelium, CornealSmartphoneCell CountMicroscopyReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID34003981
PMCPMC8024782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.