Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34003977›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2021

Corneal Optical Coherence Tomography Speckle in Crosslinked and Untreated Rabbit Eyes in Response to Elevated Intraocular Pressure.

Monika E Danielewska, Agnieszka Antonczyk, Danilo Andrade De Jesus, Maja M Rogala, Anna Blonska, Marek Cwirko, Zdzislaw Kielbowicz, D Robert Iskander

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Monika E DanielewskaWrocław University of Science and Technology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Wrocław, Poland.
Agnieszka AntonczykWrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wrocław, Poland.
Danilo Andrade De JesusErasmus University Medical Center, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Maja M RogalaWrocław University of Science and Technology, Department of Mechanics, Materials and Biomedical Engineering, Wrocław, Poland.
Anna BlonskaOphthalmology Clinical Centre SPEKTRUM, Wrocław, Poland.
Marek CwirkoOphthalmology Clinical Centre SPEKTRUM, Wrocław, Poland.
Zdzislaw KielbowiczWrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wrocław, Poland.
D Robert IskanderWrocław University of Science and Technology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Wrocław, Poland.
Wroclaw Research Centre EIT+ (Poland) · PLWroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences · PLWrocław University of Science and Technology · PLAGH University of Krakow · PLErasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To ascertain the influence of intraocular pressure (IOP) on corneal optical coherence tomography (OCT) speckle in untreated and ultraviolet A-riboflavin induced corneal collagen crosslinked rabbit eyes. Methods: Left corneas of eight rabbits were de-epithelialized and crosslinked by applying riboflavin and 30-minute ultraviolet A light exposure. After enucleation (6 months after treatment), each eyeball (treated and untreated) was mounted in a measurement setup, in which IOP was increased from 15 to 45 mm Hg in steps of 5 mm Hg. At each IOP value, single B-scans of the central cornea were acquired three times with the spectral-domain OCT Copernicus-HR. Then, three regions of interest, including the anterior, posterior, and entire corneal stroma, were automatically extracted. Five different probability distributions were used as a model for the corneal speckle and the one with the best goodness of fit was chosen for further analysis. Results: The generalized gamma distribution achieved the best goodness of fit and its scale (a) and shape (v) parameters statistically significantly changed with increasing IOP in the three regions of analysis (two-way repeated measures analysis of variance, all P < 0.05). The statistically significant difference between untreated and crosslinked eyes was observed for the shape parameters of the posterior and entire corneal stroma. Conclusions: Corneal OCT speckle is influenced by IOP and shows to be significantly different in untreated and crosslinked eyes. Corneal OCT speckle analysis has the potential to be indirectly used for assessing changes in corneal stroma in ex vivo and in vivo studies. Translational Relevance: Investigation of corneal OCT speckle statistics can offer additional diagnostic biomarkers related to changes in the corneal stroma after ocular surgeries.

Indexed as

Intraocular PressureTomography, Optical CoherenceAnimalsCorneaCorneal StromaRabbitsRiboflavinRiboflavin

Identifiers

PMID34003977
PMCPMC8088219
OpenAlexW3158519879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.