Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34003951›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2021

Validation of a Diagnostic Support System for Diabetic Retinopathy Based on Clinical Parameters.

Pedro Romero-Aroca, Raquel Verges-Pujol, Esther Santos-Blanco, Najlaa Maarof, Aida Valls, Xavier Mundet, Antonio Moreno, Luis Galindo, Marc Baget-Bernaldiz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Applications of artificial intelligence and bioinformatics methodologies in the analysis of ocular biofluid markers: a scoping review.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Pedro Romero-ArocaOphthalmology Service, Hospital Universitat Sant Joan, Institut de Investigacio Sanitaria Pere Virgili, Universitat Rovira & Virgili, Reus, Spain.
Raquel Verges-PujolOphthalmology Service, Hospital Universitat Sant Joan, Institut de Investigacio Sanitaria Pere Virgili, Universitat Rovira & Virgili, Reus, Spain.
Esther Santos-BlancoOphthalmology Service, Hospital Universitat Sant Joan, Institut de Investigacio Sanitaria Pere Virgili, Universitat Rovira & Virgili, Reus, Spain.
Najlaa MaarofDepartment of Computer Engineering and Mathematics, Universitat Rovira & Virgili, Reus, Spain.
Aida VallsDepartment of Computer Engineering and Mathematics, Universitat Rovira & Virgili, Reus, Spain.
Xavier MundetUnitat de suport a la recerca Barcelona ciutat, Insititut Universitari d'Investigacio en Atencio Primaria Jordi Gol, Barcelona, Spain.
Antonio MorenoDepartment of Computer Engineering and Mathematics, Universitat Rovira & Virgili, Reus, Spain.
Luis GalindoUniversidad Carlos III Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Marc Baget-BernaldizOphthalmology Service, Hospital Universitat Sant Joan, Institut de Investigacio Sanitaria Pere Virgili, Universitat Rovira & Virgili, Reus, Spain.
Institut d'Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili · ESUniversidad Rovira i Virgili · ESInstitut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol · ESUniversidad Carlos III de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To validate a clinical decision support system (CDSS) that estimates risk of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and to personalize screening protocols in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Methods: We utilized a CDSS based on a fuzzy random forest, integrated by fuzzy decision trees with the following variables: current age, sex, arterial hypertension, diabetes duration and treatment, HbA1c, glomerular filtration rate, microalbuminuria, and body mass index. Validation was made using the electronic health records of a sample of 101,802 T2DM patients. Diagnosis was made by retinal photographs, according to EURODIAB guidelines and the International Diabetic Retinopathy Classification. Results: The prevalence of DR was 19,759 patients (19.98%). Results yielded 16,593 (16.31%) true positives, 72,617 (71.33%) true negatives, 3165 (3.1%) false positives, and 9427 (9.26%) false negatives, with an accuracy of 0.876 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.858-0.886), sensitivity of 84% (95% CI, 83.46-84.49), specificity of 88.5% (95% CI, 88.29-88.72), positive predictive value of 63.8% (95% CI, 63.18-64.35), negative predictive value of 95.8% (95% CI, 95.68-95.96), positive likelihood ratio of 7.30, and negative likelihood ratio of 0.18. The type 1 error was 0.115, and the type 2 error was 0.16. Conclusions: We confirmed a good prediction rate for DR from a representative sample of T2DM in our population. Furthermore, the CDSS was able to offer an individualized screening protocol for each patient according to the calculated risk confidence value. Translational Relevance: Results from this study will help to establish a novel strategy for personalizing screening for DR according to patient risk factors.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic RetinopathyCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMass ScreeningRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID34003951
PMCPMC7980045
OpenAlexW3136913335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.