Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34003948›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2021

The Assessment of Visual Fields in Infants Using Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP): A Feasibility Study.

Antonios Perperidis, Alice D McTrusty, Lorraine A Cameron, Ian C Murray, Harry M Brash, Brian W Fleck, Robert A Minns, Andrew J Tatham

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Eye Tracking in Optometry: A Systematic Review.Journal of eye movement research · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Antonios PerperidisDepartment of Child Life and Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Alice D McTrustyDepartment of Child Life and Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Lorraine A CameronDepartment of Child Life and Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Ian C MurrayDepartment of Child Life and Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Harry M BrashCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Brian W FleckDepartment of Child Life and Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Robert A MinnsDepartment of Child Life and Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Andrew J TathamCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
University of Edinburgh · GBPrincess Alexandra Eye Pavilion · GBGlasgow Caledonian University · GBRoyal Hospital for Sick Children · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the feasibility of saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry (SVOP), an automated eye tracking perimeter, as a tool for visual field (VF) assessment in infants. Methods: Thirteen healthy infants aged between 3.5 and 12.0 months were tested binocularly using an adapted SVOP protocol. SVOP uses eye tracking technology to measure gaze responses to stimuli presented on a computer screen. Modifications of SVOP for testing infants included adjusting the fixation target to display a short animation, increasing the stimulus size to equivalent to Goldmann V, and introducing a tiered test pattern strategy. Binocular, single-quadrant confrontation VF testing and Keeler preferential looking cards visual acuity testing was also performed. Results: Using multiple test attempts when required, all but the youngest infant (12 of 13 [92.3%]) successfully completed a 4-point screening test. Seven infants (53.8%) successfully completed the 12-point test, four (30.8%) successfully completed the 20-point test, and three (23.1%) successfully completed the 40-point test. The effect of multiple test attempts and the complexity of the test pattern (number of test points) on performance was investigated, including test completion rate, percentage of correctly seen stimuli, and average time per tested stimulus. Conclusions: The modified SVOP test strategy allowed successful assessment of binocular VFs in healthy infants. Future data collection from larger cohorts of infants is needed to derive normative limits of detection and assess accuracy in detecting and monitoring infant VF abnormalities. Translational Relevance: Eye tracking perimetry may provide a useful method of automated VF assessment in infants.

Indexed as

Visual FieldsVisual Field TestsFeasibility StudiesHumansInfantSaccadesVision Tests

Identifiers

PMID34003948
PMCPMC7961122
OpenAlexW3136294336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.