Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34003945›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2021

Clinical 3D Imaging of the Anterior Segment With Ultrasound Biomicroscopy.

Richard W Helms, Ahmed Tahseen Minhaz, David L Wilson, Faruk H Örge

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Novel Slit Lamp-Based System for 3D Ultrasound of the Eye.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Enhanced Imaging of Ocular Surface Lesions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Risk factors of angle opening after lens extraction in patients with shallow peripheral anterior chamber.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Richard W HelmsCenter for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Adult Strabismus, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Ahmed Tahseen MinhazDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
David L WilsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Faruk H ÖrgeCenter for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Adult Strabismus, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Case Western Reserve University · USRainbow Babies & Children's Hospital · US

Funding

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH FACILITIESC06RR012463 · NCRR · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KUTINA, KENNETH L · 1997 to 1997
–
NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR012463
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) is an important ophthalmic imaging modality due to its ability to see behind pigmented iris and to visualize anterior chamber when the eye's transparency is compromised. We created a three-dimensional UBM (3D-UBM) system and acquired example images to illustrate its potential. Methods: A commercial 50-MHz two-dimensional UBM (2D-UBM) system was attached to a precision translation stage and translated across the eye to acquire an image volume. The stage was mounted on a surgical microscope, which enabled safe, stable positioning. Image processing steps included image alignment, noise reduction, and calibration. 3D visualization included alignment of the optic axis, multiplanar reformatting at arbitrary orientations, and volume rendering with optimized transfer functions. Scans were performed on cadaver and rabbit eyes. Results: 3D-UBM allowed visualization of the anterior segment tissues within a 3D anatomical context, unlike 2D-UBM. En face views and interactive slicer operations suggested an ability to plan and assess treatments, including lens placement and microcatheter cannulation of Schlemm's canal. Interactive software allowed us to make accurate measurements of tissue structures (e.g., iridocorneal angles, cyst volumes). In addition, unique measurements of ciliary tissues included single ciliary process volumes of 0.234 ± 0.093 mm3 with surface areas of 3.02 ± 1.07 mm2 and ciliary muscle volume of 67.87 mm3. Conclusions: 3D-UBM imaging of the anterior segment can be used to enable unique visualization and quantification of anterior segment structures. Translational Relevance: 3D-UBM provides informative 3D imaging of tissues in the eye that are invisible to light to potentially provide physicians with improved diagnosis, treatment planning, and treatment assessment as compared to conventional 2D-UBM.

Indexed as

Anterior Eye SegmentMicroscopy, AcousticAnimalsCiliary BodyImaging, Three-DimensionalIrisRabbits

Identifiers

PMID34003945
PMCPMC7961115
OpenAlexW3138231421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.