Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34003936›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2021

Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Quality Across Three Multicenter Clinical Studies of Diabetic Retinopathy.

Brandon J Lujan, Claire T Calhoun, Adam R Glassman, Joseph M Googe, Lee M Jampol, Michele Melia, Deborah K Schlossman, Jennifer K Sun, DRCR Retina Network

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Factors affecting optical coherence tomography angiography signal strength index in patients receiving intravitreal injection treatment.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Article
  12. Optical coherence tomography angiography in diabetic retinopathy.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Assessing the Sensitivity of OCT-A Retinal Vasculature Metrics.Translational vision science & technology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Brandon J LujanOHSU Casey Eye Institute, Portland, OR, USA.
Claire T CalhounJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL, USA.
Adam R GlassmanJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL, USA.
Joseph M GoogeSoutheastern Retina Associates, Crossville, TN, USA.
Lee M JampolFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, IL, USA.
Michele MeliaJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL, USA.
Deborah K SchlossmanJoslin Diabetes Center, Beetham Eye Institute, Harvard Department of Ophthalmology, Boston, MA, USA.
Jennifer K SunJoslin Diabetes Center, Beetham Eye Institute, Harvard Department of Ophthalmology, Boston, MA, USA.
DRCR Retina Network
Jaeb Center for Health Research · USJoslin Diabetes Center · USNorthwestern University · USSoutheastern Retina Associates · US

Funding

DRCR Retina NetworkUG1EY014231 · NEI · JAEB CENTER FOR HEALTH RESEARCH, INC. · PI Adam R Glassman, DANIEL F MARTIN · 2019 to 2026
$75.4M
NEI NIH HHS UG1 EY014231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To explore optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) quality and associated factors in multicenter clinical studies. Methods: OCTA scans were obtained from participants with diabetic retinopathy from three DRCR Retina Network clinical studies using the Optovue AngioVue and ZEISS AngioPlex. Macular (3 × 3 mm and 6 × 6 mm) and optic nerve scans were captured. Quality was assessed by the Casey Reading Center. Scans were considered "poor" if the signal strength index (SSI) was less than 55 (AngioVue) or 7 (AngioPlex) or if excess motion, media opacities, beam defocus, incorrect axial position, or other artifacts were present. Results: Included were 7539 scans from 787 eyes (461 participants). Sixty-one percent of scans were considered "good" (n = 4630). Of the 3 × 3-mm (n = 2294), 6 × 6-mm (n = 2705), and optic nerve scans (n = 2540), 62%, 63%, and 59%, respectively, were good. Differences in percentage of good scans by machine were not identified (61% of 6216 for the AngioVue and 63% of 1323 for the AngioPlex). The primary reason for poor scans was low SSI for the AngioVue (67%) and excess motion for the AngioPlex (47%). Good scans were associated with younger age (60 ± 12 years vs. 65 ± 11 years; P < 0.001), male gender (64% of males had good scans vs. 57% female; P = 0.007), and better visual acuity (ETDRS letter score 86.5 ± 6.4 [approximate Snellen equivalent 20/20] vs. 81.6 ± 9.7 [approximate Snellen equivalent 20/25]; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Scan quality or analysis must be improved for OCTA metrics to be used as outcomes in future research. Translational Relevance: Clinicians and researchers should be aware that poor SSI and artifacts are common issues for OCTA images.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic RetinopathyAgedFemaleFluorescein AngiographyHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetinal VesselsTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID34003936
PMCPMC7937991
OpenAlexW3134976799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.