Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34003912›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2021

Choroidal Thickness by Handheld Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography in Term Newborns.

Laura C Huang, Hao Zhou, Alex T Legocki, N Max Scoville, Junping Zhong, Leona Ding, Ruikang K Wang, Michelle T Cabrera

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Assessing visual and refractive outcomes of subretinal fluid detected by handheld swept-source optical coherence tomography in full-term newborns.Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laura C HuangDivision of Pediatric Ophthalmology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA.
Hao ZhouDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Alex T LegockiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
N Max ScovilleDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Junping ZhongDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Leona DingDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ruikang K WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Michelle T CabreraDivision of Pediatric Ophthalmology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA.
University of Washington · USSeattle Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To describe normative values for choroidal thickness in newborns and characterize their relationship to vitreoretinal features. Methods: Term newborns underwent awake, handheld swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) in this prospective cohort study. An automated segmentation algorithm followed by manual adjustments measured choroidal thickness at the fovea and five perifoveal locations. Two masked, trained graders, with a third mediating disagreements, analyzed scans for vitreoretinal findings. OCT vitreoretinal findings, including dome-shaped macula, subretinal fluid, punctate hyperreflective vitreous opacities, persistent inner retinal layers, foveal ellipsoid zone, tractional and non-tractional vitreous bands, epiretinal membrane, cystoid macular edema, vessel elevation, scalloped retinal layers, hyporeflective vessels, and retinal spaces, were assessed and correlated with foveal choroidal thickness using a generalized linear mixed model. Results: Fifty-nine eyes of 39 infants (mean gestational age, 39.5 weeks; 18 male, 46%) were included. Mean foveal choroidal thickness was 455.5 ± 93.9 µm. Choroid was thinner inferonasally (343.6 ± 106.2 µm) compared to superonasally (368.4 ± 92.9 µm; P = 0.03) and superotemporally (369.6 ± 100.6 µm; P = 0.02). Thinner foveal choroidal thickness was associated with absence of a foveal ellipsoid zone (437.1 ± 78.5 µm vs. 553.7 ± 93.9 µm; P = 0.02). Choroidal thickness was not significantly associated with other OCT findings. Conclusions: We identified an association between thinner choroid and foveal immaturity. Additional study is needed to determine whether choroidal development impacts visual outcomes. Translational Relevance: Handheld SS-OCT achieved normative measurements for choroidal thickness across the macula in term newborns, providing a foundation for future investigations into the role of choroidal development in infancy.

Indexed as

Macula LuteaTomography, Optical CoherenceChoroidFovea CentralisHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID34003912
PMCPMC7900868
OpenAlexW3131269237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.