ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2021
Correction for the Influence of Cataract on Macular Pigment Measurement by Autofluorescence Technique Using Deep Learning.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Advanced Analysis Tools for Two Wavelength Autofluorescence Imaging of Macular Xanthophyll Carotenoids: ALSTAR2 Baseline.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Observational
- The Relationship Between Macular Pigment Optical Volume and Visual Function in Glaucoma Patients.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Evaluation of a Portable Handheld Heterochromatic Flicker Photometer in Measuring Macular Pigment Optical Density.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Positive Association between Macular Pigment Optical Density and Glomerular Filtration Rate: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Macular and Plasma Xanthophylls Are Higher in Age-related Macular Degeneration than in Normal Aging: Alabama Study on Early Age-related Macular Degeneration 2 Baseline.Ophthalmology science · 2023Article
- Lutein and Zeaxanthin Distribution in the Healthy Macula and Its Association with Various Demographic Factors Examined in Pseudophakic Eyes.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Measurements of macular pigment optical density (MPOD) by the autofluorescence technique yield underestimations of actual values in eyes with cataract. We applied deep learning (DL) to correct this error. Subjects and Methods: MPOD was measured by SPECTRALIS (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) in 197 eyes before and after cataract surgery. The nominal MPOD values (= preoperative value) were corrected by three methods: the regression equation (RE) method, subjective classification (SC) method (described in our previous study), and DL method. The errors between the corrected and true values (= postoperative value) were calculated for local MPODs at 0.25°, 0.5°, 1°, and 2° eccentricities and macular pigment optical volume (MPOV) within 9° eccentricity. Results: The mean error for MPODs at four eccentricities was 32% without any correction, 15% with correction by RE, 16% with correction by SC, and 14% with correction by DL. The mean error for MPOV was 21% without correction and 14%, 10%, and 10%, respectively, with correction by the same methods. The errors with any correction were significantly lower than those without correction (P < 0.001, linear mixed model with Tukey's test). The errors with DL correction were significantly lower than those with RE correction in MPOD at 1° eccentricity and MPOV (P < 0.001) and were equivalent to those with SC correction. Conclusions: The objective method using DL was useful to correct MPOD values measured in aged people. Translational Relevance: MPOD can be obtained with small errors in eyes with cataract using DL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.