ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2021
Two-Photon Microperimetry: A Media Opacity-Independent Retinal Function Assay.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Visual Function Loss Through Opacified Media: Comparison Between Single- and Two-Photon Vision.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Color vision with a two-photon infrared RGB display.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Seeing nonspectral colors with single wavelength stimulation in two-photon vision.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Method for the determination of the luminance of two-photon vision stimuli.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Boosting 2-photon vision with adaptive optics.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- From mouse to human: Accessing the biochemistry of vision in vivo by two-photon excitation.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2023Review
- Seeing invisible light: 2-photon microperimetry to measure visual function.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2022Article
- Infrared- and white-light retinal sensitivity in glaucomatous neuropathy.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- In vivo imaging of the human eye using a 2-photon-excited fluorescence scanning laser ophthalmoscope.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2022Article
- Pupillary Light Reflex Induced by Two-Photon Vision.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2021Article
- Retinal Organoids Long-Term Functional Characterization Using Two-Photon Fluorescence Lifetime and Hyperspectral Microscopy.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2021Article
- Two-photon microperimetry with picosecond pulses.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Compare results obtained using infrared two-photon microperimetry (2PM-IR) with conventional visual function tests in healthy subjects of varying ages with and without simulated media opacities. Methods: Subjects from two separate cohort studies completed cone contrast threshold (CCT) testing, conventional microperimetry, visible light microperimetry from a novel device (2PM-Vis), and infrared two-photon microperimetry. The first cohort study, which consisted of six healthy volunteers (23 to 29 years of age), evaluated the effects of simulated media opacities on visual performance testing. Subjects underwent testing on four visual function devices nine separate times under the following conditions: no filter, red filter, green filter, blue filter, light brown filter, dark brown filter, polarized black filter (0° rotation), and polarized black filter (90° rotation). Subjects subsequently performed 2PM-IR and 2PM-Vis testing without a filter in the mydriatic state. The second cohort study evaluated the effect of age on visual test performance in 42 healthy subjects split between two groups (ages 20-40 years and 60-80 years). Results: Retinal sensitivity measured by 2PM-IR demonstrated lower variability than all other devices relying on visible spectrum stimuli. Retinal sensitivity decreased proportionally with the transmittance of light through each filter. CCT scores and retinal sensitivity decreased with age in all testing modalities. Visible spectrum testing modalities demonstrated larger test result differences between young and old patient cohorts; this difference was inversely proportional to the wavelength of the visual function test. Conclusions: 2PM-IR mitigates media opacities that may mask small differences in retinal sensitivity when tested with conventional visual function testing devices. Translational Relevance: Conventional visual function tests that emit visible light may not detect differences in retinal function during the early stages of age-related diseases due to the confounding effects of cataracts. Infrared light, which has greater transmittance through ocular tissue, may reliably quantify retinal sensitivity and thereby detect degenerative changes early on.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.