ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2021
A Wide-Field Optical Coherence Tomography Normative Database Considering the Fovea-Disc Relationship for Glaucoma Detection.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Detection of Disease Progression Using Widefield Optical Coherence Tomography in the Nonhuman Primate Experimental Glaucoma Model.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Wide-Field Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging Improves Rate of Change Detection in Progressing Glaucomatous Eyes Compared With Standard-Field Imaging.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Characterisation of the normal human ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer using widefield optical coherence tomography.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2024Article
- Detecting disease progression in mild, moderate and severe glaucoma.Current opinion in ophthalmology · 2023Review
- Prediction of visual field defects from macular optical coherence tomography in glaucoma using cluster analysis.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2022Article
- Article
- Clinical Evaluations of Macular Structure-Function Concordance With and Without Drasdo Displacement.Translational vision science & technology · 2022Article
- Developing a normative database for retinal perfusion using optical coherence tomography angiography.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: One purpose of this study was to collect wide-field swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) data from healthy eyes and build a wide-filed normative database. Another purpose was to compare the glaucoma diagnostic ability of new parameters based on this normative database to the parameters that are currently in use, such as the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer, and ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness. Methods: This study had 220 healthy eyes and 292 eyes with early-stage glaucoma (EG) and moderate-stage glaucoma (MG) enrolled. Using the wide-field SS-OCT images (12 × 9 mm) of healthy eyes, a wide-field normative database was constructed by transforming and combining the individual images into a uniform template using the fovea and optic disc centers as fixed landmarks. Adjustment for the disc size was conducted. With this normative database, new parameters based on the ratio of the fovea-disc distance (FDD) consisting of the fovea-disc relationship were evaluated. The glaucoma diagnostic ability was assessed based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: Among the new peripapillary parameters, the RNFL of the circumference of the circle with diameter 0.8 FDD showed the highest AUC value for EG and MG, but the value was not significantly superior to that of the initial RNFL (AUC = 0.940 vs. 0.937, P = 0.631). Among the macular parameters, the GCC of the area of the circle of 1.5 FDD showed the highest AUC value for EG and MG, and the value was significantly superior to that of initial GCC (AUC = 0.929 vs. 0.919, P = 0.033). However, there was no significant difference between the initial and adjusted GCC thickness in patients included in the EG or MG groups separately. Conclusions: A wide-field normative database was built to consider the relationship between the fovea and the optic disc. Considering this aspect, we found that the GCC analysis using a broader area presented a significantly greater glaucoma diagnostic performance for EG and MG in the macula than the initial parameter for the GCC. Translational Relevance: Based on this wide-field normative database, the clinical use of a wide-field deviation map may help diagnose the patients with EG and MG in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.