Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34003886›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2021

Eye-Movement-Based Assessment of the Perceptual Consequences of Glaucomatous and Neuro-Ophthalmological Visual Field Defects.

Rijul Saurabh Soans, Alessandro Grillini, Rohit Saxena, Remco J Renken, Tapan Kumar Gandhi, Frans W Cornelissen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Rapid assessment of peripheral visual crowding.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  7. Deviated Saccadic Trajectory as a Biometric Signature of Glaucoma.Translational vision science & technology · 2023
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Rijul Saurabh SoansDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology - Delhi, New Delhi, India.
Alessandro GrilliniLaboratory of Experimental Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
Rohit SaxenaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Remco J RenkenCognitive Neuroscience Center, Department of Biomedical Sciences of Cells and Systems, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
Tapan Kumar GandhiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology - Delhi, New Delhi, India.
Frans W CornelissenLaboratory of Experimental Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Groningen · NLAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INIndian Institute of Technology Delhi · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Assessing the presence of visual field defects (VFD) through procedures such as perimetry is an essential aspect of the management and diagnosis of ocular disorders. However, even the latest perimetric methods have shortcomings-a high cognitive demand and requiring prolonged stable fixation and feedback through a button response. Consequently, an approach using eye movements (EM)-as a natural response-has been proposed as an alternate way to evaluate the presence of VFD. This approach has given good results for computer-simulated VFD. However, its use in patients is not well documented yet. Here we use this new approach to quantify the spatiotemporal properties (STP) of EM of various patients suffering from glaucoma and neuro-ophthalmological VFD and controls. Methods: In total, 15 glaucoma patients, 37 patients with a neuro-ophthalmological disorder, and 21 controls performed a visual tracking task while their EM were being recorded. Subsequently, the STP of EM were quantified using a cross-correlogram analysis. Decision trees were used to identify the relevant STP and classify the populations. Results: We achieved a classification accuracy of 94.5% (TPR/sensitivity = 96%, TNR/specificity = 90%) between patients and controls. Individually, the algorithm achieved an accuracy of 86.3% (TPR for neuro-ophthalmology [97%], glaucoma [60%], and controls [86%]). The STP of EM were highly similar across two different control cohorts. Conclusions: In an ocular tracking task, patients with VFD due to different underlying pathology make EM with distinctive STP. These properties are interpretable based on different clinical characteristics of patients and can be used for patient classification. Translational Relevance: Our EM-based screening tool may complement existing perimetric techniques in clinical practice.

Indexed as

GlaucomaVisual Field TestsEye MovementsHumansVision DisordersVisual Fields

Identifiers

PMID34003886
PMCPMC7873497
OpenAlexW3127228183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.