Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34003876›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Reproductive healthcare in prison: A qualitative study of women's experiences and perspectives in Ontario, Canada.

Jessica Liauw, Jessica Jurgutis, Elysée Nouvet, Brigid Dineley, Hannah Kearney, Naomi Reaka, Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis, Leslea Peirson, Fiona Kouyoumdjian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Methods and tools used to assess patient experience with healthcare services in prisons: a scoping review.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Should Physicians Be Permitted to Refuse Follow-Up Care to Patients Who Have Received an Organ Transplant Through Organ Trafficking?Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jessica LiauwDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1573-5574
Jessica JurgutisDepartment of Indigenous Learning, Lakehead University, Ontario, Canada.
Elysée NouvetSchool of Health Studies, University of Western Ontario, Ontario, Canada.
Brigid DineleyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Hannah KearneyFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7199-1548
Naomi ReakaFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada.
Donna Fitzpatrick-LewisSchool of Nursing, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada.
Leslea PeirsonIndependent Researcher, Ontario, Canada.
Fiona KouyoumdjianDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore women's experiences and perspectives of reproductive healthcare in prison.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured focus groups in 2018 with women in a provincial prison in Ontario, Canada. We asked participants about their experiences and perspectives of pregnancy and contraception related to healthcare in prison. We used a combination of deductive and inductive content analysis to categorize data. A concept map was generated using a reproductive justice framework.

resultsThe data reflected three components of a reproductive justice framework: 1) women have limited access to healthcare in prison, 2) reproductive safety and dignity influence attitudes toward pregnancy and contraception, and 3) women in prison want better reproductive healthcare. Discrimination and stigma were commonly invoked throughout women's experiences in seeking reproductive healthcare.

conclusionsImproving reproductive healthcare for women in prison is crucial to promoting reproductive justice in this population. Efforts to increase access to comprehensive, responsive, and timely reproductive healthcare should be informed by the needs and desires of women in prison and should actively seek to reduce their experience of discrimination and stigma in this context.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth Services AccessibilityPrisonsAdultContraceptionFemaleFocus GroupsHumansOntarioPregnancyQualitative ResearchReproductionSocial Stigma

Identifiers

PMID34003876
PMCPMC8130921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.