ArticlePloS one2021
Trustworthiness appraisals of faces wearing a surgical mask during the Covid-19 pandemic in Germany: An experimental study.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving the Assessment of Childhood Adversity: Factors Influencing Questionnaire and Interview Method Concordance.Journal of child & adolescent trauma · 2026Article
- The Impact of Threatening Facial Expressions on Negotiation: An Eye-Tracking Study.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- Caregiver Report of Children's Exposure to Adverse Life Events: Concordance Between Questionnaire and Interview Approaches.Journal of interpersonal violence · 2024Article
- The social factors behind the mask: contextual effects on trait impressions from faces wearing a face mask.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2024Article
- Article
- The COVID-19 pandemic and changes in social behavior: Protective face masks reduce deliberate social distancing preferences while leaving automatic avoidance behavior unaffected.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2024Article
- Development and testing of a questionnaire on the expectations and experiences with wearing face masks in inpatient and day hospitals.PloS one · 2024Article
- Facial expression and emotion.Laryngo- rhino- otologie · 2023Article
- With or without the Mask: Age Differences in Perceived Trustworthiness and Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Editorial: Impact of face covering on social cognition and interaction.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Hidden faces, altered perceptions: the impact of face masks on interpersonal perception.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Review
- Trustworthiness judgments and Borderline Personality Disorder: an experimental study on the interplay of happiness and trustworthiness appraisals and the effects of wearing face masks during the Covid-19 pandemic in Germany.Borderline personality disorder and emotion dysregulation · 2022Article
- Communicating and reading emotion with masked faces in the Covid era: A short review of the literature.Psychiatry research · 2022Review
- The contribution of respiratory and hearing protection use to psychological distress in the workplace: a scoping review.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2022Article
- The effects of face coverings, own-ethnicity biases, and attitudes on emotion recognition.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2022Article
- Facial impression of trustworthiness biases statement credibility unless suppressed by facemask.Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) · 2022Article
- "One minute it's an airborne virus, then it's a droplet virus, and then it's like nobody really knows…": Experiences of pandemic PPE amongst Australian healthcare workers.Infection, disease & health · 2022Article
- Masked emotions: Do face mask patterns and colors affect the recognition of emotions?Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2022Article
- Face masks versus sunglasses: limited effects of time and individual differences in the ability to judge facial identity and social traits.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2022Article
- Emotional context can reduce the negative impact of face masks on inferring emotions.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDuring the Covid-19 pandemic, the negative effects of wearing a mouth-nose cover (MNC) on interpersonal functioning have been discussed in public media but empirical studies on how wearing MNCs affect social judgements are sparse. In the present study, we investigated the effects of MNCs on trustworthiness appraisals, the influence of changes due to MNCs in evaluating joy, and the relationship between a social-cognitive appraisal bias and a participant's characteristics.
methodsAll participants (N = 165) judged the intensity of happiness and trustworthiness in calm facial stimuli presented with and without a surgical mask covering part of the face. We analysed the relationship of changes in judgements evoked by MNCs to participants' evaluations of MNCs as protective tools and explored their associations with the burden experienced by wearing MNCs, compliance to behaviour recommendations, their risk associated with the pandemic, and their levels of psychological distress.
resultsOverall, calm facial stimuli covered with MNCs were evaluated as less trustworthy and, to an even stronger extent, less happy than uncovered facial stimuli. However, participants varied in whether they showed a negative or positive evaluation of faces with MNCs; the negative bias was stronger in those participants who attributed lower protective potential to MNCs, experienced a higher burden while wearing MNCs, wore MNCs less often, and experienced a higher level of psychological distress.
conclusionsA negative bias in trustworthiness appraisals of faces with a positive emotional expression covered by MNCs is linked to a participant's evaluation of MNCs as inefficient and burdening and their experience of high psychological distress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.