Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34003815›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2021

Identification of a DNA Methylation-Based Prognostic Signature for Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Yinqi Gao, Xuelong Wang, Shihui Li, Zhiqiang Zhang, Xuefei Li, Fangcai Lin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yinqi GaoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Capital Medical University Electric Power Teaching Hospital, Beijing, China (mainland).
Xuelong WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Capital Medical University Electric Power Teaching Hospital, Beijing, China (mainland).
Shihui LiDepartment of Breast Surgery, Capital Medical University Electric Power Teaching Hospital, Beijing, China (mainland).
Zhiqiang ZhangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Capital Medical University Electric Power Teaching Hospital, Beijing, China (mainland).
Xuefei LiDepartment of Breast Surgery, Capital Medical University Electric Power Teaching Hospital, Beijing, China (mainland).
Fangcai LinDepartment of Breast Surgery, Capital Medical University Electric Power Teaching Hospital, Beijing, China (mainland).
Capital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Aberrant DNA methylation is an important biological regulatory mechanism in malignant tumors. However, it remains underutilized for establishing prognostic models for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). MATERIAL AND METHODS Methylation data and expression data downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were used to identify differentially methylated sites (DMSs). The prognosis-related DMSs were selected by univariate Cox regression analysis. Functional enrichment was analyzed using DAVID. A protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed using STRING. Finally, a methylation-based prognostic signature was constructed using LASSO method and further validated in 2 validation cohorts. RESULTS Firstly, we identified 743 DMSs corresponding to 332 genes, including 357 hypermethylated sites and 386 hypomethylated sites. Furthermore, we selected 103 prognosis-related DMSs by univariate Cox regression. Using a LASSO algorithm, we established a 5-DMSs prognostic signature in TCGA-TNBC cohort, which could classify TNBC patients with significant survival difference (log-rank p=4.97E-03). Patients in the high-risk group had shorter overall survival than patients in the low-risk group. The excellent performance was validated in GSE78754 (HR=2.42, 95%CI: 1.27-4.59, log-rank P=0.0055). Moreover, for disease-free survival, the prognostic performance was verified in GSE141441 (HR=2.09, 95%CI: 1.28-3.44, log-rank P=0.0027). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that the 5-DMSs signature could serve as an independent risk factor. CONCLUSIONS We constructed a 5-DMSs signature with excellent performance for the prediction of disease-free survival and overall survival, providing a guide for clinicians in directing personalized therapeutic regimen selection of TNBC patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCohort StudiesDisease-Free SurvivalDNA MethylationGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMiddle AgedPrognosisProtein Interaction MapsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID34003815
PMCPMC8140526
OpenAlexW3133504841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.