Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34003764›Full record

ReviewJMIR mHealth and uHealth2021

Best Practice Guidance for Digital Contact Tracing Apps: A Cross-disciplinary Review of the Literature.

James O'Connell, Manzar Abbas, Sarah Beecham, Jim Buckley, Muslim Chochlov, Brian Fitzgerald, Liam Glynn, Kevin Johnson, John Laffey, Bairbre McNicholas and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Contact Tracing Research: A Literature Review Based on Scientific Collaboration Network.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Appraisal of a Contact Tracing Training Program for COVID-19 in Greece Focusing on Vulnerable Populations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

James O'ConnellLero, Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Software, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-1553-4489
Manzar AbbasLero, Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Software, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-0645-9253
Sarah BeechamLero, Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Software, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-1584-5447
Jim BuckleyLero, Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Software, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-6928-6746
Muslim ChochlovLero, Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Software, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-6580-0311
Brian FitzgeraldLero, Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Software, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-9193-2863
Liam GlynnSchool of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-6153-9363
Kevin JohnsonDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-2116-8078
John LaffeySchool of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-1246-9573
Bairbre McNicholasSchool of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-9524-4021
Bashar NuseibehLero, Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Software, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-3476-053X
Michael O'CallaghanSchool of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-8450-186X
Ian O'KeeffeLero, Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Software, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-7329-0617
Abdul RazzaqLero, Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Software, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-4351-1487
Kaavya RekanarLero, Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Software, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-5766-6650
Ita RichardsonLero, Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Software, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-5493-2837
Andrew SimpkinSchool of Mathematics, Statistics and Applied Mathematics, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-4975-444X
Cristiano StorniLero, Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Software, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-1601-0900
Damyanka TsvyatkovaLero, Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Software, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-1686-7413
Jane WalshSchool of Psychology, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-5476-1348
Thomas WelshLero, Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Software, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-3134-5469
Derek O'KeeffeLero, Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Software, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-8501-2382
Science Foundation Ireland · IEOllscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IEUniversity of Limerick · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital contact tracing apps have the potential to augment contact tracing systems and disrupt COVID-19 transmission by rapidly identifying secondary cases prior to the onset of infectiousness and linking them into a system of quarantine, testing, and health care worker case management. The international experience of digital contact tracing apps during the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrates how challenging their design and deployment are.

objectiveThis study aims to derive and summarize best practice guidance for the design of the ideal digital contact tracing app.

methodsA collaborative cross-disciplinary approach was used to derive best practice guidance for designing the ideal digital contact tracing app. A search of the indexed and gray literature was conducted to identify articles describing or evaluating digital contact tracing apps. MEDLINE was searched using a combination of free-text terms and Medical Subject Headings search terms. Gray literature sources searched were the World Health Organization Institutional Repository for Information Sharing, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control publications library, and Google, including the websites of many health protection authorities. Articles that were acceptable for inclusion in this evidence synthesis were peer-reviewed publications, cohort studies, randomized trials, modeling studies, technical reports, white papers, and media reports related to digital contact tracing.

resultsEthical, user experience, privacy and data protection, technical, clinical and societal, and evaluation considerations were identified from the literature. The ideal digital contact tracing app should be voluntary and should be equitably available and accessible. User engagement could be enhanced by small financial incentives, enabling users to tailor aspects of the app to their particular needs and integrating digital contact tracing apps into the wider public health information campaign. Adherence to the principles of good data protection and privacy by design is important to convince target populations to download and use digital contact tracing apps. Bluetooth Low Energy is recommended for a digital contact tracing app's contact event detection, but combining it with ultrasound technology may improve a digital contact tracing app's accuracy. A decentralized privacy-preserving protocol should be followed to enable digital contact tracing app users to exchange and record temporary contact numbers during contact events. The ideal digital contact tracing app should define and risk-stratify contact events according to proximity, duration of contact, and the infectiousness of the case at the time of contact. Evaluating digital contact tracing apps requires data to quantify app downloads, use among COVID-19 cases, successful contact alert generation, contact alert receivers, contact alert receivers that adhere to quarantine and testing recommendations, and the number of contact alert receivers who subsequently are tested positive for COVID-19. The outcomes of digital contact tracing apps' evaluations should be openly reported to allow for the wider public to review the evaluation of the app.

conclusionsIn conclusion, key considerations and best practice guidance for the design of the ideal digital contact tracing app were derived from the literature.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mobile ApplicationsContact TracingHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2appautomated contact tracingbest practiceCOVID-19designdigital contact tracingmHealthmobile appmonitoringreviewSARS-CoV-2surveillancetracing

Identifiers

PMID34003764
PMCPMC8189288
OpenAlexW3146260345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.