Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34003545›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2021

Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Chinese Patients with Gastric Cancer by HER2 Status: A Noninterventional Registry Study (EVIDENCE).

Shukui Qin, Jiafu Ji, Rui-Hua Xu, Wei Wang, Yong Tang, Feng Bi, Jin Li, Kang Wang, Jian-Ming Xu, Qingxia Fan and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Shukui Qin *Nanjing Bayi Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Jiafu Ji *Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Rui-Hua XuSun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Wei WangThe First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Yong TangAffiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, People's Republic of China.
Feng BiWest China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Jin LiFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Kang WangSichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Jian-Ming XuChinese People's Liberation Army 307 Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Qingxia FanThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, People's Republic of China.
Wuyun SuAffiliated Hospital, Inner Mongolia Medical College, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, People's Republic of China.
Lin ShenKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
81th Hospital of PLA · CNChinese People’s Liberation Army 263 hospital · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CNFirst People's Hospital of Foshan · CNFourth People's Hospital of Sichuan Province · CNFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNInner Mongolia Medical College Hospital · CNPeking University · CNPeking University Cancer Hospital · CNSichuan University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNXinjiang Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReal-world safety and effectiveness data for trastuzumab plus chemotherapy treatment of patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastric cancer (mGC) in China are lacking. PATIENTS AND

methodsEVIDENCE was a prospective, multicenter, noninterventional registry study evaluating the safety and effectiveness of trastuzumab in five cohorts of Chinese patients with gastric cancer, stratified by HER2 status and trastuzumab treatment. Effectiveness was analyzed for cohorts I (HER2-positive, trastuzumab treated), II (HER2-positive, trastuzumab untreated), and IV (HER2-negative, trastuzumab untreated); trastuzumab-related adverse events (AEs) were analyzed for cohort I.

resultsCohorts I, II, and IV included 174, 113, and 422 patients, respectively. Most patients received first-line chemotherapy (87.6%). Median overall survival (OS1) for first-line treatment was 22.3, 17.2, and 17.4 months in cohorts I, II, and IV, respectively. After excluding patients who had surgery, respective median OS1 was 19.9, 15.3, and 12.9 months. Respective first-line progression-free survival (PFS1) was 8.2, 6.9, and 6.2 months; and respective first-line response rates (RR) were 51.7%, 18.4%, and 32.8%. Cohort I was significantly favored over cohort II for propensity score-matched first-line median OS1 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61), PFS1 (HR, 0.64), and RR (odds ratio, 4.93). Trastuzumab-related AEs, grade 3-5 AEs, serious AEs, and AEs with a fatal outcome occurred in 23.6%, 3.4%, 2.3%, and 0.6% of cohort I patients, respectively.

conclusionSafety profiles were consistent with those known for trastuzumab and chemotherapy; trastuzumab treatment improved outcomes. Our study provides real-world data supporting first-line trastuzumab plus chemotherapy in Chinese patients with HER2-positive mGC. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This prospective, noninterventional registry study aimed to provide safety and effectiveness data for the use of trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy in Chinese patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastric cancer (mGC) from the real-world clinical setting. Trastuzumab plus first-line chemotherapy was shown to be safe and to improve outcomes when compared with patients treated with chemotherapy alone. Trastuzumab was effective within a range of treatment regimens; subgroup analysis showed that trastuzumab paired most effectively with the XELOX regimen. This study provides real-world clinical safety and effectiveness data supporting the use of trastuzumab in the treatment of Chinese patients with HER2-positive mGC.

Indexed as

Stomach NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChinaErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansProspective StudiesRegistriesTrastuzumabErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesTrastuzumabChinaEpidermal growth factor receptorGastric cancerRegistriesTrastuzumab

Identifiers

PMID34003545
PMCPMC8417850
OpenAlexW3196913005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.