Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34003474›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2021

Cutting Through the "Gray Area": An Analysis of the IBC Regulatory Oversight of Applications of CRISPR Technology in Clinical Research.

Westley F Weiss

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Westley F WeissJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA. WWeiss9@jhu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2749-1423

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) technology has quickly ushered in a new era of gene editing and offered exciting potential for the development of biomedical products. While the breadth of applications for CRISPR encompasses nearly the entire field of medical science, its utilization to produce next-generation CAR T cells stands to benefit most substantially in the short-term. These novel therapeutics are now beginning to enter the clinical trial phase of the numerous approval pipelines, but does the existing regulatory framework have the capability to adequately review and approve the initiation of these new age research endeavors in the clinical setting? This analysis will illuminate the similarity and differences between CRISPR developed interventions and existing techniques used to produce biomedical products from a regulatory perspective in the United States. Further, the "gray area" surrounding CRISPR regulatory oversight will be explored and recommendations will be made to facilitate the elimination of inconsistencies that currently exist in the assessment of this work prior to the initiation of associated clinical trials.

Indexed as

Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsCRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingHumansTechnologyUnited StatesBiosafetyClinical researchCRISPRFDAIBCNIH GuidelinesRegulatory oversight

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.