Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34003449›Full record

ArticleOral radiology2022

Evaluation of trabecular bone healing using fractal dimension analysis after augmentation of alveolar crests with autogenous bone grafts: a preliminary study.

Yusuf Nuri Kaba, Neşe İspekter Öner, Mehmet Amuk, Suheyb Bilge, Emrah Soylu, Ahmet Emin Demirbaş

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oral radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Comparison of Decompression vs Enucleation Using Fractal Analysis with Panoramic Radiography for Odontogenic Cysts.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yusuf Nuri KabaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, 38039, Kayseri, Melikgazi, Turkey.
Neşe İspekter ÖnerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, 38039, Kayseri, Melikgazi, Turkey. ispekternese@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1009-8297
Mehmet AmukDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, 38039, Kayseri, Melikgazi, Turkey.
Suheyb BilgeDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, 38039, Kayseri, Melikgazi, Turkey.
Emrah SoyluDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, 38039, Kayseri, Melikgazi, Turkey.
Ahmet Emin DemirbaşDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, 38039, Kayseri, Melikgazi, Turkey.
Erciyes University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study is to evaluate bone remodeling after alveolar crest augmentation with autogenous bone grafts.

methods50 patients who were applied augmentation due to alveolar deficiency were included in this study. Fractal dimensions were measured on the radiographs in the preoperative, postoperative, follow-up periods. The ROI was selected specific to each patient, but repeated in a standardized manner on subsequent radiographs.

resultsA total of 50 patients were included in the study; There were 31 females and 19 males. Implants were placed in all patients without any complications. The mean fractal dimensions on the graft recipient side were statistically higher in the postoperative 5th month compared to the postoperative 1st week (p = 0.002). The mean fractal dimensions on the donor side were statistically higher in the preoperative and postoperative 5th month compared to the postoperative 1st week (p < 0.001).

conclusionAny clinical imaging method cannot fully reflect the histological microstructures of the bone. Evaluating the fractal analysis together with the clinical results can demonstrate adequate bone healing and quality prior to implant placement. Fractal analysis is a non-invasive, reproducible, method but further, prospective, randomized, controlled clinical studies are needed to estimate bone quality prior to implant placement.

Indexed as

Alveolar Ridge AugmentationCancellous BoneBone TransplantationFemaleFractalsHumansMaleProspective StudiesAugmentationBone graftFractal analysisPanoramic radiography

Identifiers

PMID34003449
OpenAlexW3162359490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.