Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34003387›Full record

ArticleBotanical studies2021

Agricultural management practices influence the soil enzyme activity and bacterial community structure in tea plantations.

Yu-Pei Chen, Chia-Fang Tsai, P D Rekha, Sudeep D Ghate, Hsi-Yuan Huang, Yi-Han Hsu, Li-Ling Liaw, Chiu-Chung Young

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Botanical studies, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yu-Pei ChenDepartment of Public Health and Medical Technology, Xiamen Medical College, Xiamen, 361023, Fujian, China.
Chia-Fang TsaiDepartment of Soil and Environmental Sciences, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, 40227, Taiwan.
P D RekhaYenepoya Research Centre, Yenepoya University, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Sudeep D GhateYenepoya Research Centre, Yenepoya University, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Hsi-Yuan HuangSchool of Life and Health Sciences and Warshel Institute for Computational Biology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, 518172, Guangdong,, China.
Yi-Han HsuDepartment of Soil and Environmental Sciences, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, 40227, Taiwan.
Li-Ling LiawFood Industry Research and Development Institute, Bioresource Collection and Research Center, HsinChu, 300, Taiwan.
Chiu-Chung YoungDepartment of Soil and Environmental Sciences, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, 40227, Taiwan. ccyoung@mail.nchu.edu.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0828-3802

Funding

Ministry of Education the Higher Education Sprout ProjectMinistry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 105-2621-M-005-006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe soil quality and health of the tea plantations are dependent on agriculture management practices, and long-term chemical fertilizer use is implicated in soil decline. Hence, several sustainable practices are used to improve and maintain the soil quality. Here, in this study, changes in soil properties, enzymatic activity, and dysbiosis in bacterial community composition were compared using three agricultural management practices, namely conventional (CA), sustainable (SA), and transformational agriculture (TA) in the tea plantation during 2016 and 2017 period. Soil samples at two-months intervals were collected and analyzed.

resultsThe results of the enzyme activities revealed that acid phosphatase, arylsulfatase, β-glucosidase, and urease activities differed considerably among the soils representing the three management practices. Combining the redundancy and multiple regression analysis, the change in the arylsulfatase activity was explained by soil pH as a significant predictor in the SA soils. The soil bacterial community was predominated by the phyla Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, Chloroflexi, and Bacteroidetes in the soil throughout the sampling period. Higher Alpha diversity scores indicated increased bacterial abundance and diversity in the SA soils. A significant relationship between bacterial richness indices (SOBS, Chao and ACE) and soil pH, K and, P was observed in the SA soils. The diversity indices namely Shannon and Simpson also showed variations, suggesting the shift in the diversity of less abundant and more common species. Furthermore, the agricultural management practices, soil pH fluctuation, and the extractable elements had a greater influence on bacterial structure than that of temporal change.

conclusionsBased on the cross-over analysis of the bacterial composition, enzymatic activity, and soil properties, the relationship between bacterial composition and biologically-driven ecological processes can be identified as indicators of sustainability for the tea plantation.

Indexed as

Agricultural managementArylsulfataseBacterial diversityBacterial richnessNext-generation sequencingSoil healthTemporal change

Identifiers

PMID34003387
PMCPMC8131499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.