Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34003376›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2022

[Health workforce development in rheumatology : A mapping exercise and wake-up call for health policy].

Ellen Kuhlmann, Luzia Bruns, Kirsten Hoeper, Torsten Witte, Diana Ernst, Alexandra Jablonka

Erratum issuedAbstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ellen KuhlmannKlinik für Rheumatologie und Immunologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland. kuhlmann.ellen@mh-hannover.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7337-114X
Luzia BrunsKlinik für Rheumatologie und Immunologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland.
Kirsten HoeperKlinik für Rheumatologie und Immunologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland.
Torsten WitteKlinik für Rheumatologie und Immunologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland.
Diana ErnstKlinik für Rheumatologie und Immunologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland.
Alexandra JablonkaKlinik für Rheumatologie und Immunologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveHealth workforce shortage in German rheumatology has been identified as a healthcare service and delivery problem. Health policy has increased staffing targets, yet effective intervention strategies are lacking. This research aimed to systematically map the rheumatology workforce to improve the evidence for interventions and explore possibilities for more effective health workforce management.

methodsThe WHO National Health Workforce Accounts provided a conceptual framework for the mapping exercise. Four major sets of indicators were selected, comprising staffing levels, health labor market flows, composition and education/training. A comparison of age groups and time series was applied to explore trends. Public statistics and other secondary sources served our analysis using descriptive methodology.

resultsIn Germany there are 1076 physicians specialized in internal medical rheumatology. Absolute numbers have nearly doubled (91%) since 2000 but with a strong demographic bias. Between 2000 and 2019 numbers markedly increased in the group aged 50 years and older but only by 9% in the younger group under 50 years; since 2010 the group aged 40-50 years even faces a decrease. In 2019, the absolute numbers of rheumatologists in retirement age exceeded those aged 40 years and under. Since 2015 an expanding workforce trend has overall flattened but this was strongest in the hospital sector; the numbers in resident training did not show any relevant growth.

conclusionHealth workforce trends reveal that an available number of rheumatologists cannot meet new health policy planning targets. There is a need for effective health workforce management, focusing on innovation in resident training, improved task delegation and gender equality.

Indexed as

RheumatologyAgedHealth PolicyHealth WorkforceHumansMiddle AgedRheumatologistsWorkforceAge-group related trendsGender-specific trendsGermanyHealth workforce developmentProfession statisticsRheumatologyWHO National Health Workforce Accounts

Identifiers

PMID34003376
PMCPMC8129704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.