ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2021
EGFR mutation analysis on circulating free DNA in NSCLC: a single-center experience.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mutation-Specific Response to Ramucirumab inJTO clinical and research reports · 2026Article
- Liquid Biopsy for EGFR Mutation Detection in NSCLC: Evaluation of Plasma ctDNA and Comparison with Plasma exoDNA.Iranian biomedical journal · 2025Article
- Importance ofCancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMonitoring mutation status in circulating free DNA (cfDNA) during target therapy could hold significant clinical importance in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our aim is to establish if EGFR mutational status change on cfDNA has predictive value that can impact clinical management of NSCLC patients care.
methodsThis study included 30 patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Blood samples were collected at diagnosis (T0) and in 19 patients during therapy (T1).
resultsConcordance between T0 and T1 EGFR mutation status for patients evaluable for both samples (n = 19) was 79%, with a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 55.5-100.0) and specificity of 60.0% (95% CI: 26.2-86.8). For the patients in oncological therapy with targeted drug and with T1 sample available (n = 18), survival outcomes were evaluated. For both mutation-negative T0 and T1 patients, 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) was 66.7% (95% CI: 27.2-100.0) and 12-month overall survival (OS) was 100% (95% CI: 1.00-1.00); for patients mutated both at T0 and T1, PFS was 22.2% (95% CI: 6.5-75.4%) and OS was 55.6% (95% CI: 20.4-96.1%).
conclusionEGFR mutation status can be assessed using cfDNA for routine purposes and longitudinal assessment of plasma mutation is an easy approach to monitor the therapeutic response or resistance onset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.