Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34003351›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

Prognostic risk factors and survival models for T3 locally advanced rectal cancer: what can we learn from the baseline MRI?

Qing Zhao, Lijuan Wan, Shuangmei Zou, Chongda Zhang, Tuya E, Yang Yang, Feng Ye, Xinming Zhao, Han Ouyang, Hongmei Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Qing ZhaoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Lijuan WanDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Shuangmei ZouDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Chongda ZhangDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Tuya EDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Yang YangDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Feng YeDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Xinming ZhaoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Han OuyangDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Hongmei ZhangDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China. dr_zhanghm@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4722-2180
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

Beijing Hope Run Special Fund of the Cancer Foundation of China LC2017B18National Natural Science Foundation of China 81971589Peking Union Medical College Youth Fund, the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 3332018078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the baseline MRI characteristics for predicting survival outcomes and construct survival models for risk stratification to facilitate personalized treatment and follow-up strategies in patients with MRI-defined T3 (mrT3) locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 256 mrT3 LARC patients evaluated between 2008 and 2012 in our institution, with an average follow-up period of 6.8 ± 1.2 years. The baseline MRI characteristics, clinical data, and follow-up information were evaluated. The patients were randomized into a training cohort (TC, 186 patients) and validation cohort (VC, 70 patients). The TC dataset was used to develop multivariate nomograms for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), while the VC dataset was used for independent validation of the models. Harrell concordance (C) indices and Hosmer-Lemeshow calibration were used to evaluate the performances of the models.

resultsBaseline mrT3 substage, extramural venous invasion (EMVI) grading, mucinous adenocarcinoma, mesorectal fascia involvement, elevated pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen level, and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) were independent predictors of DFS. T3 substage, EMVI grading, and NCRT were also independent predictors of OS. The nomograms constructed permitted the individualized prediction of 3-year and 5-year DFS and 5-year OS with high discrimination (C-index range, 0.833-0.892) and good calibration in the TC and VC.

conclusionsWe have identified baseline MRI characteristics that help independently predict survival outcomes in patients with mrT3 LARC. The survival models based on these characteristics allow for the individualized pretreatment risk stratification in patients with mrT3 LARC. KEY POINTS: • Baseline MRI characteristics can independently stratify risk and predict survival outcomes in patients with mrT3 LARC. • The nomograms built using selected baseline MRI characteristics facilitate the individualized pretreatment risk stratification and help with clinical decision-making in patients with mrT3 LARC. • MR-defined risk factors should, therefore, be carefully reported in the baseline MRI evaluation.

Indexed as

Rectal NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyDisease-Free SurvivalHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoadjuvant TherapyPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsMagnetic resonance imagingNeoadjuvant therapyNomogramsRectal neoplasmsSurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID34003351
OpenAlexW3160220900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.