SynthesisJAMA network open2021
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- Minimally invasive trabecular meshwork surgery for open-angle glaucoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Racial, ethnic, sex, and age representation in clinical trials of radiopharmaceutical tumor therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Inequities in glaucoma research: an analysis of Cochrane systematic reviews and randomized trials.Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2025Pooled it
- Demographic recruitment bias of adults in United States randomized clinical trials by disease categories between 2008 to 2019: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2023Pooled it
- Patterns of Glaucoma Treatment Use in Asian American Patients With Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2026Article
- Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma among Black and Latinx Populations: Exploring Racial Disparities in the United States.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Review
- Racial and ethnic diversity in clinical studies reported to ClinicalTrials.gov, 2009-2024.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- Racial disparities in ophthalmology clinical trials: barriers to participation and potential solutions.Eye (London, England) · 2026Review
- An Examination of Demographic Involvement in Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery and Cataract Surgery Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Prescription of a Novel Agent in Medical Management of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.Ophthalmic epidemiology · 2025Article
- Ensemble learning to enhance accurate identification of patients with glaucoma using electronic health records.JAMIA open · 2025Article
- Understanding Glaucoma: Why it Remains a Leading Cause of Blindness Worldwide.Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde · 2025Review
- Affordable Sinskey Hook Goniotomy and Cataract Surgery in Black and Afro-Latino Patients Diagnosed with Glaucoma: Retrospective Real-World One-Year Results.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Rho Kinase (ROCK) Inhibitors in the Treatment of Glaucoma and Glaucoma Surgery: A Systematic Review of Early to Late Phase Clinical Trials.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Enrolment characteristics in age-related macular degeneration clinical trials: a cross-sectional study.Eye (London, England) · 2025Article
- A Cross-Sectional Study of Sex, Race, and Ethnic Representation in Burn Registered Clinical Trials.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025Article
- Role of topological indices in predictive modeling and ranking of drugs treating eye disorders.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Breaking the mould: challenging the status quo of clinical trial response definitions for invasive fungal diseases-a debate.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2024Article
- Features Associated with Visible Lamina Cribrosa Pores in Individuals of African Ancestry with Glaucoma: Primary Open-Angle African Ancestry Glaucoma Genetics (POAAGG) Study.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Social determinants of health and health disparities in glaucoma: A review.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The disease burden for primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is highest among racial/ethnic minority groups, particularly Black individuals. The prevalence of POAG worldwide is projected to increase from 52.7 million in 2020 to 79.8 million in 2040, a 51.4% increase attributed mainly to Asian and African individuals. Given this increase, key stakeholders need to pay particular attention to creating a diverse study population in POAG clinical trials. Objective: To assess the prevalence of racial/ethnic minorities in POAG clinical research trials compared with White individuals. Data Sources: This meta-analysis consisted of publicly available POAG clinical trials using ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, and Drugs@FDA from 1994 to 2019. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials that reported on interventions for POAG and included demographic subgroups including sex and race/ethnicity. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, 2 independent reviewers extracted study-level data for a random-effects meta-analysis. A third person served as the tiebreaker on study selection. Microsoft Excel 2016 (Microsoft Corporation) and SAS, version 9.4 (SAS Institute) were used for data collection and analyses. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were the prevalence of each demographic subgroup (White, Black, Hispanic/Latino, other race/ethnicity groups, and female or male) in each trial according to the trial start year, study region, and study sponsor. Participation rates are expressed as percentages. Results: A total of 105 clinical trials were included in the meta-analysis, including 33 428 POAG clinical trial participants (18 404 women [55.1%]). Overall, 70.7% were White patients, 16.8% were Black patients, 3.4% were Hispanic/Latino patients, and 9.1% were individuals of other races/ethnicities, including Asian, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, American Indian or Alaska Native, and unreported as defined by the US Census. The mean (SD) numbers of participants by race/ethnicity were 236.5 (208.2) for White, 58.4 (70.0) for Black, 29.9 (71.1) for Hispanic/Latino, and 31.1 (94.3) for other race/ethnicity. According to the test for heterogeneity using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, the I2 statistic was 98%, indicating high heterogeneity of outcomes in the included trials. A multiple linear regression analysis was performed to assess any trend and significance between participation by Black individuals and the year the study started, the region in which the study took place, and the study sponsor. There was no significant increase of Black participant enrollment from 1994 to 2019 (r2 = 0.11; P = .17) and no significant association between Black participant enrollment and clinical trial region (r2 = 0.16; P = .50), but there was a significant association between Black participant enrollment and study sponsor (r2 = 0.94; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: This meta-analysis found that compared with White individuals, individuals from racial/ethnic minority groups had a very low participation rate in POAG clinical trials despite having a higher prevalence among the disease population. Despite measures to increase clinical trial diversity, there has not been a significant increase in clinical trial participation among Black individuals, the group most affected by this disease; this disparity in POAG clinical trial representation can raise questions about the true safety and efficacy of approved medical interventions for this disease and should prompt further research on how to increase POAG clinical trial diversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.