Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34003271›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Association of Socioeconomic Status With Dementia Diagnosis Among Older Adults in Denmark.

Jindong Ding Petersen, Sonja Wehberg, Aake Packness, Nanna Herning Svensson, Nana Hyldig, Søren Raunsgaard, Merethe Kirstine Andersen, Jesper Ryg, Stewart W Mercer, Jens Søndergaard and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
13.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Exploring the views of key stakeholders on dementia risk prediction in primary care in areas of socioeconomic deprivation: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Toward Relationality in Infectious Disease Research.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jindong Ding PetersenResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Sonja WehbergResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Aake PacknessResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Nanna Herning SvenssonResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Nana HyldigOPEN (Open Patient Data Explorative Network), Odense University Hospital, Region of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Søren RaunsgaardResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Merethe Kirstine AndersenResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Jesper RygGeriatric Research Unit, Department of Geriatric Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Stewart W MercerAdvanced Care Research Centre, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Jens SøndergaardResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Frans Boch WaldorffResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
University of Southern Denmark · DKOdense University Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Low socioeconomic status (SES) has been identified as a risk factor for the development of dementia. However, few studies have focused on the association between SES and dementia diagnostic evaluation on a population level. Objective: To investigate whether household income (HHI) is associated with dementia diagnosis and cognitive severity at the time of diagnosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population- and register-based cross-sectional study analyzed health, social, and economic data obtained from various Danish national registers. The study population comprised individuals who received a first-time referral for a diagnostic evaluation for dementia to the secondary health care sector of Denmark between January 1, 2017, and December 17, 2018. Dementia-related health data were retrieved from the Danish Quality Database for Dementia. Data analysis was conducted from October 2019 to December 2020. Exposures: Annual HHI (used as a proxy for SES) for 2015 and 2016 was obtained from Statistics Denmark and categorized into upper, middle, and lower tertiles within 5-year interval age groups. Main Outcomes and Measures: Dementia diagnoses (Alzheimer disease, vascular dementia, mixed dementia, dementia with Lewy bodies, Parkinson disease dementia, or other) and cognitive stages at diagnosis (cognitively intact; mild cognitive impairment but not dementia; or mild, moderate, or severe dementia) were retrieved from the database. Univariable and multivariable logistic and linear regressions adjusted for age group, sex, region of residence, household type, period (2017 and 2018), medication type, and medical conditions were analyzed for a possible association between HHI and receipt of dementia diagnosis. Results: Among the 10 191 individuals (mean [SD] age, 75 [10] years; 5476 women [53.7%]) included in the study, 8844 (86.8%) were diagnosed with dementia. Individuals with HHI in the upper tertile compared with those with lower-tertile HHI were less likely to receive a dementia diagnosis after referral (odds ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.55-0.78) and, if diagnosed with dementia, had less severe cognitive stage (β, -0.16; 95% CI, -0.21 to -0.10). Individuals with middle-tertile HHI did not significantly differ from those with lower-tertile HHI in terms of dementia diagnosis (odds ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.77-1.09) and cognitive stage at diagnosis (β, 0.01; 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.06). Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this study revealed a social inequality in dementia diagnostic evaluation: in Denmark, people with higher income seem to receive an earlier diagnosis. Public health strategies should target people with lower SES for earlier dementia detection and intervention.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexSocial ClassAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCross-Sectional StudiesDementiaDenmarkFemaleHumansMalePopulation SurveillanceRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID34003271
PMCPMC8132141
OpenAlexW3161703985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.