Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34003270›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Patient Participation in Clinical Trials of Oncology Drugs and Biologics Preceding Approval by the US Food and Drug Administration.

Nora Hutchinson, Benjamin Carlisle, Adelaide Doussau, Rafia Bosan, Eli Gumnit, Amanda MacPherson, Dean A Fergusson, Jonathan Kimmelman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Quantifying Patient Investment in Novel Neurological Drug Development.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022
    Article
  7. The Human Cost: Patient Contribution to Clinical Trials in Neurology.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nora HutchinsonStudies of Translation, Ethics, and Medicine, Biomedical Ethics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Benjamin CarlisleStudies of Translation, Ethics, and Medicine, Biomedical Ethics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Adelaide DoussauStudies of Translation, Ethics, and Medicine, Biomedical Ethics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Rafia BosanStudies of Translation, Ethics, and Medicine, Biomedical Ethics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Eli GumnitStudies of Translation, Ethics, and Medicine, Biomedical Ethics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Amanda MacPhersonStudies of Translation, Ethics, and Medicine, Biomedical Ethics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Dean A FergussonCentre for Practice-Changing Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Jonathan KimmelmanStudies of Translation, Ethics, and Medicine, Biomedical Ethics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Several studies have estimated the financial inputs for successful drug development. Such analyses do not capture the large investment that patient study participants commit to drug development. Objective: To estimate the volume of patients required to achieve a first US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for a new anticancer drug or biologic therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included a random sample of prelicense oncology drugs and biologics with a trial site in the United States that were launched into clinical efficacy testing between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2010. Drugs and biologics were identified using ClinicalTrials.gov registration records. Total patient enrollment was captured over an 8-year span, and each intervention was classified based on whether it received FDA approval and was deemed as having intermediate or substantial value according to the American Society of Clinical Oncology Value Framework (ASCO-VF) score. Secondarily, the association between patient numbers and intervention characteristics was tested. Data were analyzed in February 2020. Main Outcomes and Measure: The prespecified primary outcome was the number of patients enrolled in prelicense trials per FDA approval. Results: A total of 120 drugs and biologics were included in our study, with 84 (70.0%) targeted agents, 20 (16.7%) immunotherapies, and 71 (59.2%) novel agents. A total of 13 drugs and biologics (10.8%; 95% CI, 5.3%-16.8%) in our sample gained FDA approval within 8 years, of which 1 (7.7%) was deemed of intermediate value and 3 (23.1%) were deemed of substantial value using ASCO-VF scoring. Overall, 158 810 patients were enrolled in 1335 trials testing these drugs and biologics, 47 913 (30.2%) in trials that led to FDA approval and 110 897 (69.8%) in trials that did not. An estimated 12 217 (95% CI, 7970-22 215) patient study participants contributed to prelicense trials per FDA approval. The estimated number of patients needed to produce a single FDA-approved drug or biologic of intermediate or substantial ASCO-VF clinical value was 39 703 (95% CI, 19 391-177 991). Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this cohort study make visible the substantial patient investment required for prelicense oncology drug development. Such analyses can be used to devise policies that maximize the clinical impact of research on a per-patient basis.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBiological ProductsClinical Trials as TopicCohort StudiesDrug ApprovalHumansNeoplasmsPatient ParticipationPrior AuthorizationUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationAntineoplastic AgentsBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID34003270
PMCPMC8132139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.