ArticleJAMA2021
US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Forty-Five Is the New Fifty.
Article in JAMA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- The association between organised colorectal cancer screening strategies and reduction of its related mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Article
- Dietary conflicts with standard clinical procedures for colonoscopy in Phenylketonuria: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2026Article
- Discrete-Event Simulation Modeling Framework for Cancer Interventions and Population Health in R (DESCIPHR): An Open-Source Pipeline.PharmacoEconomics · 2026Article
- High Accuracy Stool Biomarkers of Precancerous Colorectal Cancer Identified Using a 2000-Plex Immunoproteomic Screen.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2026Article
- Evaluation of colorectal cancer screening practices in Rhode Island, 2011-2021.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2026Article
- Review
- Appropriateness of Recommendations for Surveillance Colonoscopy After Polypectomy-A Comparison of Adherence to the 2012 and 2020 USMSTF Guidelines.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Article
- Utility of Stool-Based Tests for Colorectal Cancer Detection: A Comprehensive Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Influence of Political Ideology on Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Adults in the United States.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2024Article
- Change in onset age of first primary colorectal cancer in the USA.International journal of colorectal disease · 2023Article
- Association ofGastro hep advances · 2023Article
- Endoscopic Screening and Risk of Colorectal Cancer according to Type 2 Diabetes Status.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2022Article
- Screening for Colorectal Cancer.Hematology/oncology clinics of North America · 2022Review
- Leveraging Electronic Health Records to Measure Low-Value Screening Colonoscopy.The American journal of medicine · 2022Article
- Automatic Colorectal Cancer Screening Using Deep Learning in Spatial Light Interference Microscopy Data.Cells · 2022Article
- Examining colorectal cancer screening uptake and health provider recommendations among underserved middle aged and older African Americans.Health promotion perspectives · 2022Article
- Telehealth and racial disparities in colorectal cancer screening: A pilot study of how virtual clinician characteristics influence screening intentions.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2022Article
- CST: A Multitask Learning Framework for Colorectal Cancer Region Mining Based on Transformer.BioMed research international · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34003238What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.