Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34003099›Full record

ArticleMedecine sciences : M/S2021

[Newborn screening for congenital hypothyroidism and congenital adrenal hyperplasia: Benefits and costs of a successful public health program].

Guy Van Vliet, Scott D Grosse

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medecine sciences : M/S, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Guy Van VlietService d'endocrinologie et Centre de recherche, Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine et Département de pédiatrie, Université de Montréal, 3175 Côte Sainte-Catherine, Montréal (Québec) H3T 1C5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1113-590X
Scott D GrosseNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, Atlanta, GA, 30341, États-Unis.ORCID 0000-0003-1078-6855
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine · CANational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Newborn screening is an important public health program and a triumph of preventive medicine. Economic analyses show that the benefits of newborn screening clearly outweigh the costs for certain diseases, but not necessarily for other ones. This is due to the great diversity of the natural history of the diseases detected, to the fact that each of these diseases considered individually is rare, and to differences in the effectiveness of interventions. In addition, the benefit-cost ratio of screening for a particular disorder may differ between countries, specifically between high-income and low- and middle-income countries. The burden of a disorder may also be alleviated by increased clinical awareness and effective clinical services, even in the absence of newborn screening. In this article, we focus on economic analyses of newborn screening for primary congenital hypothyroidism, which has been in place in high-income countries for roughly 40 years, and for classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency. Screening for the latter is not yet universal, even in high-income countries, although the lack of universal implementation may reflect factors other than economic considerations.

Indexed as

Adrenal Hyperplasia, CongenitalCongenital HypothyroidismCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansInfant, NewbornNeonatal ScreeningPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID34003099
PMCPMC8387970
OpenAlexW3162341101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.