Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34002976›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine2022

Towards the implementation of clinical quality management at the national level: description of current types of rehabilitation services for spinal cord injury/disorder in Switzerland using an interdisciplinary consensus process.

Anke Scheel-Sailer, Melissa Selb, Hans P Gmünder, Michael Baumberger, Armin Curt, Margret Hund-Georgiadis, Xavier Jordan, Gerold Stucki, Swiss SCI/D Rehabilitation Interest Group

Open access · diamondAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anke Scheel-SailerSwiss Paraplegic Center, Nottwil, Switzerland - anke.scheel-sailer@paraplegie.ch.
Melissa SelbSwiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.
Hans P GmünderSwiss Paraplegic Center, Nottwil, Switzerland.
Michael BaumbergerSwiss Paraplegic Center, Nottwil, Switzerland.
Armin CurtUniversitätsklinik Balgrist, Zentrum für Paraplegie, Zurich, Switzerland.
Margret Hund-GeorgiadisRehab of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Xavier JordanClinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland.
Gerold StuckiDepartment of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Swiss SCI/D Rehabilitation Interest Group
Swiss Paraplegic Center · CHSwiss Paraplegic Research · CHClinique Romande de Réadaptation · CHUniversitätsklinik Balgrist · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAligned with WHO's Global Disability Action Plan 2014-2021, the Section and Board of the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS-PRM) set up a plan to strengthen rehabilitation and support International Classification for Functioning, Disability and Health-based clinical quality management. Accordingly, the UEMS-PRM developed the European Framework of Rehabilitation Service Types ("European Framework"). The specifications of these service types may differ across countries and for specific application areas.

aimThe objective of this paper is to report on the development of a framework of rehabilitation service types for spinal cord injury/disorder (SCI/D) in Switzerland ("SCI/D Framework").

designQuality improvement in healthcare.

settingThe setting of this study was in Switzerland. POPULATION: Representatives of medical societies.

methodsA multistage consensus process was conducted and involved representatives of national medical and rehabilitation societies recruited based on a situational analysis of existing national quality management documents. The process comprised the development of an initial framework based on the European Framework, a survey, a face-to-face consensus meeting, and a confirmatory feedback round on the version of the SCI/D Framework resulting from the meeting.

resultsRepresentatives of 12 national medical societies, one political body in rehabilitation, one national interprofessional rehabilitation society, the Swiss representative of two international rehabilitation societies and heads of four SCI/D specialized centers participated in the multistage consensus process. After the modifications based on the results of the survey, the consensus meeting and confirmatory feedback round were made, the resulting SCI/D Framework version encompassed 19 rehabilitation service types, structured in nine different clusters, of which six were subdivided into general, other specific or SCI/D-specific rehabilitation service types.

conclusionsDeveloping the SCI/D Framework for Switzerland was a further step toward refining existing quality criteria and national quality standards for rehabilitation and toward scaling up SCI/D rehabilitation in Switzerland. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The SCI/D Framework can support national efforts to address any gaps in health care provision and guide an optimal response to meet the rehabilitation needs of persons with SCI/D in Switzerland. Furthermore, the development of the SCI/D Framework illustrates an outline that can be used to develop a similar framework for other health conditions and for other countries to follow in adapting the European Framework for their own country context.

Indexed as

Persons with DisabilitiesPhysical and Rehabilitation MedicineSpinal Cord InjuriesHumansSwitzerland

Identifiers

PMID34002976
PMCPMC9980538
OpenAlexW3163683702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.