Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34002861›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of primatology2021

Nutritional geometry of female chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Moreen Uwimbabazi, David Raubenheimer, Mnason Tweheyo, Gilbert I Basuta, Nancy L Conklin-Brittain, Richard W Wrangham, Jessica M Rothman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of primatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Response of fruit fly (Physiological entomology · 2024
    Article
  7. Towards an integrated understanding of dietary phenotypes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  8. Protein appetite as an integrator in the obesity system: the protein leverage hypothesis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Moreen UwimbabaziDepartment of Zoology, Entomology and Fisheries Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0003-1902-315X
David RaubenheimerCharles Perkins Centre and School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Mnason TweheyoDepartment of Forestry, Biodiversity and Tourism, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Gilbert I BasutaDepartment of Zoology, Entomology and Fisheries Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Nancy L Conklin-BrittainDepartment of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Richard W WranghamDepartment of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Jessica M RothmanDepartment of Anthropology, Hunter College of the City University of New York, New York City, New York, USA.

Funding

Cumulative Life Course Effects on Aging and Health in a Long-Lived Primate ModelR37AG049395 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI Elizabeth Vinson Lonsdorf, Melissa Emery Thompson · 2022 to 2026
$3.2M
Biodemography of Aging in Wild ChimpanzeesR01AG049395 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI MITANI, JOHN CARY, ROSATI, ALEXANDRA G · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG049395NIA NIH HHS R37 AG049395
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primate foraging is influenced by the spatial and temporal distribution of foods, which may facilitate or constrain optimal nutrient intakes. Chimpanzees are frugivorous primates that mainly subsist on ripe fruit that is typically low in available protein (AP) and high in easily digestible carbohydrates. Because chimpanzees prefer ripe fruit and often eat it in large quantities compared with other foods, we hypothesized that protein intake would be tightly regulated while non-protein energy (NPE) would vary with fruit intake. To test this hypothesis, we conducted all-day follows on female chimpanzees, recorded all types of food consumed (i.e., drupes, figs, and non-fruit foods), estimated the nutritional contributions of these foods to daily NPE and AP intake and investigated how the ratio of NPE to AP varied due to changes in the types of foods consumed. Although the proportions of drupes, figs, and non-fruit foods varied in their diets, female chimpanzees maintained a relatively stable intake of AP while intake of NPE varied depending on the daily diet, demonstrating that like other frugivorous primates studied to date, chimpanzees prioritize protein. The mean daily ratio of NPE to AP was 7:1, which is similar to that of other frugivorous primates studied. Our results support the hypothesis that frugivorous animals may generally prioritize AP, while maximizing NPE intake within that constraint, and could shed light on aspects of human dietary evolution.

Indexed as

DietPan troglodytesAnimalsEnergy IntakeFruitdiet compositioneastern chimpanzeesmacronutrient balancingnutritional geometry

Identifiers

PMID34002861
PMCPMC8225573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.