Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34002639›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2023

Longer Screws Can Reduce the Stress on the Upper Instrumented Vertebra With Long Spinal Fusion Surgery: A Finite Element Analysis Study.

Shin Oe, Kengo Narita, Kazuhiro Hasegawa, Raghu N Natarajan, Yu Yamato, Tomohiko Hasegawa, Go Yoshida, Tomohiro Banno, Hideyuki Arima, Yuki Mihara and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Morphometric analysis of the thoracic spine using CT and its association with upper instrumented vertebra fracture in adult spinal deformity surgery.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shin OeDivision of Geriatric Musculoskeletal Health, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0794-4026
Kengo NaritaDepartment of Medical, Maruemu Works Co., Ltd, Osaka, Japan.
Kazuhiro HasegawaNiigata Spine Surgery Center, Niigata, Japan.
Raghu N NatarajanRush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Yu YamatoDivision of Geriatric Musculoskeletal Health, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan.
Tomohiko HasegawaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan.
Go YoshidaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan.
Tomohiro BannoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan.
Hideyuki ArimaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan.
Yuki MiharaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan.
Hiroki UshirozakoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7722-2205
Koichiro IdeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4253-568X
Tomohiro YamadaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7220-7321
Yuh WatanabeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan.
Yukihiro MatsuyamaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan.
Hamamatsu University School of Medicine · JPRush University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designA finite element analysis study.

objectiveOf proximal junctional failure, upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) fracture can causes severe spinal cord injury. Previously, we reported that higher occupancy rate of pedicle screw (ORPS) at UIV prevented UIV fracture in adult spinal deformity surgery; we had not yet tested this finding using a biomechanical study. The purpose of present study was to measure the differences in loads on the UIV according to the length of PS and ORPS.

methodsWe designed an FE model of a lumbar spine (L1-S1) using FE software. The PS was set from L2 to S1 and connected the rod. The FE model simulated flexion (8 Nm) to investigate the loads at UIV (L2) according to the length of the PS. There were 5 screw lengths examined: 40 (ORPS 36.4%), 45 (48.5%), 50 (66.7%), 55 (81.8%), and 60 mm (93.9%).

resultsStress with bending motion was likely to occur at the upper front edge of the vertebral body, the pedicles, and the screw insertion point. The maximum equivalent stress according to screw lengths of 40, 45, 50, 55, and 60 mm were 45.6, 37.2, 21.6, 13.3, and 14.8 MPa, respectively. The longer screw, the less stress was applied to UIV. No remarkable change was observed between the screw lengths of 55 and 60 mm.

conclusionsIncreasing ORPS to 81.8% or more reduced the load on the UIV. To prevent UIV fracture, the PS length in the UIV should be more than ORPS 81.8%.

Indexed as

adult spinal deformityfinite element analysisoccupancy rate of pedicle screwproximal junctional failureupper instrumented vertebral fracture

Identifiers

PMID34002639
PMCPMC10189329
OpenAlexW3160895647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.