Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34002512›Full record

ArticleWorld psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA)2021

Internalizing psychopathology and all-cause mortality: a comparison of transdiagnostic vs. diagnosis-based risk prediction.

Hyunsik Kim, Nicholas A Turiano, Miriam K Forbes, Roman Kotov, Robert F Krueger, Nicholas R Eaton, HiTOP Utility Workgroup

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Predicting epigenetic aging by the transdiagnostic internalizing spectrum vs. depressive and anxiety syndromes.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hyunsik KimDepartment of Psychology, Sogang University, Seoul, South Korea.
Nicholas A TurianoDepartment of Psychology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Miriam K ForbesDepartment of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Roman KotovDepartment of Psychiatry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, NY, USA.
Robert F KruegerDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MI, USA.
Nicholas R EatonDepartment of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
HiTOP Utility Workgroup

Funding

U19 MIDlife in the United States-Diversity Supplement-WellsU19AG051426 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CHRISTOPHER L COE · 2016 to 2026
$74.8M
NIA NIH HHS U19 AG051426
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have documented the utility of a transdiagnostic internalizing factor in predicting important future outcomes (e.g., subsequent mental disorder diagnoses). To date, however, no study has investigated whether an internalizing factor predicts mortality risk. Also, while pre-vious studies of mortality risk have emphasized its associations with particular internalizing disorders, no study has assessed how the transdiagnostic internalizing factor vs. disorder-specific variance differently predict that risk. The primary aims of this study were to explore: a) whether the internalizing factor predicts mortality risk, b) whether particular internalizing psychopathologies uniquely predict mortality risk over and beyond the transdiagnostic internalizing factor, and c) whether there is a significant interaction of internalizing with self-reported health in the prediction of mortality risk. We utilized a large national sample of American adults from the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS), a longitudinal study that examined midlife development of individuals across multiple waves between 1995 and 2015. Data were analyzed for the 6,329 participants who completed the phone interview and self-administered questionnaire in MIDUS 1 (1995-1996) and were then followed up until October 31, 2015 or until death. To investigate the association between internalizing and mortality risk, we used the semi-parametric proportional hazards Cox model, where survival time was regressed on a latent internalizing factor. Overall findings indicate that a transdiagnostic internalizing factor significantly predicts mortality risk over a 20-year period (hazard ratio, HR=1.12, 95% CI: 1.05-1.16, p<0.01) and that internalizing outperforms disorder-specific variance (e.g., depression-specific variance) in the prediction of that risk. Further, there was a significant interaction between transdiagnostic internalizing and self-reported health, whereby internalizing psychopathology had a specific association with early death for individuals with excellent self-reported health condition (HR=1.50, 95% CI: 1.17-1.84, p<0.05). This highlights the clinical utility of using the transdiagnostic internalizing factor for prediction of an important future outcome, and supports the argument that internalizing psychopathology can be a meaningful liability to explore in public health practice.

Indexed as

diagnosis-based predictiongeneralized anx­iety disorderInternalizing factormajor depressive disordermortalityneuroticismpanic disordertransdiagnostic prediction

Identifiers

PMID34002512
PMCPMC8129836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.