Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34002511›Full record

ArticleWorld psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA)2021

The Horyzons project: a randomized controlled trial of a novel online social therapy to maintain treatment effects from specialist first-episode psychosis services.

Mario Alvarez-Jimenez, Peter Koval, Lianne Schmaal, Sarah Bendall, Shaunagh O'Sullivan, Daniela Cagliarini, Simon D'Alfonso, Simon Rice, Lee Valentine, David L Penn and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Mend the Gap: Online User-Led Adjuvant Treatment for Psychosis: A Systematic Review on Recent Findings.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Review
  16. Mental health help-seeking by US college students with a diagnosis of psychosis.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Mario Alvarez-JimenezOrygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Peter KovalMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Lianne SchmaalOrygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Sarah BendallOrygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Shaunagh O'SullivanOrygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Daniela CagliariniOrygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Simon D'AlfonsoOrygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Simon RiceOrygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Lee ValentineOrygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
David L PennDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Chris MilesOrygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Penni RussonOrygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Jessica PhillipsOrygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Carla McEneryOrygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Reeva LedermanSchool of Computing and Information Systems, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Eoin KillackeyOrygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Cathrine MihalopoulosSchool of Health and Social Development, Deakin Health Economics, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Cesar Gonzalez-BlanchCentre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Tamsyn GilbertsonOrygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Shalini LalSchool of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Sue Maree CottonOrygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Helen HerrmanOrygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Patrick D McGorryOrygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
John F M GleesonHealthy Brain and Mind Research Centre and School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to determine whether, following two years of specialized support for first-episode psychosis, the addition of a new digital intervention (Horyzons) to treatment as usual (TAU) for 18 months was more effective than 18 months of TAU alone. We conducted a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Participants were people with first-episode psychosis (N=170), aged 16-27 years, in clinical remission and nearing discharge from a specialized service. They were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive Horyzons plus TAU (N=86) or TAU alone (N=84) between October 2013 and January 2017. Horyzons is a novel, comprehensive digital platform merging: peer-to-peer social networking; theory-driven and evidence-informed therapeutic interventions targeting social functioning, vocational recovery and relapse prevention; expert clinician and vocational support; and peer support and moderation. TAU involved transfer to primary or tertiary community mental health services. The primary outcome was social functioning at 18 months as measured by the Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP). Forty-seven participants (55.5%) in the Horyzons plus TAU group logged on for at least 6 months, and 40 (47.0%) for at least 9 months. Social functioning remained high and stable in both groups from baseline to 18-month follow-up, with no evidence of significant between-group differences (PSP mean difference: -0.29, 95% CI: -4.20 to 3.63, p=0.77). Participants in the Horyzons group had a 5.5 times greater increase in their odds to find employment or enroll in education compared with those in TAU (odds ratio, OR=5.55, 95% CI: 1.09-28.23, p=0.04), with evidence of a dose-response effect. Moreover, participants in TAU were twice as likely to visit emergency services compared to those in the Horyzons group (39% vs. 19%; OR=0.31, 95% CI: 0.11-0.86, p=0.03, number needed to treat, NNT=5). There was a non-significant trend for lower hospitalizations due to psychosis in the Horyzons group vs. TAU (13% vs. 27%; OR=0.36, 95% CI: 0.11-1.08, p=0.07, NNT=7). So, although we did not find a significant effect of Horyzons on social functioning compared with TAU, the intervention was effective in improving vocational or educational attainment, a core component of social recovery, and in reducing usage of hospital emergency services, a key aim of specialized first-episode psychosis services. Horyzons holds significant promise as an engaging and sustainable intervention to provide effective vocational and relapse prevention support for young people with first-episode psychosis beyond specialist services.

Indexed as

digital interventioneducational attainmentemploymentfirst-episode psychosisHoryzonshospitalizationpeer supportsocial functioninguse of emergency services

Identifiers

PMID34002511
PMCPMC8129860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.