Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34002476›Full record

ReviewJournal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials2021

Enhancing wound healing dressing development through interdisciplinary collaboration.

Briauna Hawthorne, J Kai Simmons, Braden Stuart, Robert Tung, David S Zamierowski, Adam J Mellott

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A critical overview of challenging roles of medicinal plants in improvement of wound healing technology.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Preparation and characterization ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Electrochemical Devices in Cutaneous Wound Healing.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Briauna HawthorneDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
J Kai SimmonsDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Braden StuartDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Robert TungDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
David S ZamierowskiDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Adam J MellottDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The process of wound healing includes four phases: Hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. Many wound dressings and technologies have been developed to enhance the body's ability to close wounds and restore the function of damaged tissues. Several advancements in wound healing technology have resulted from innovative experiments by individual scientists or physicians working independently. The interplay between the medical and scientific research fields is vital to translating new discoveries in the lab to treatments at the bedside. Tracing the history of wound dressing development reveals that there is an opportunity for deeper collaboration between multiple disciplines to accelerate the advancement of novel wound healing technologies. In this review, we explore the different types of wound dressings and biomaterials used to treat wounds, and we investigate the role of multidisciplinary collaboration in the development of various wound management technologies to illustrate the benefit of direct collaboration between physicians and scientists.

Indexed as

BandagesWound HealingBiocompatible MaterialsBiocompatible Materialsbiomedical engineeringinterdisciplinary teamsnegative pressure wound therapywound dressingswound healing

Identifiers

PMID34002476
PMCPMC8519107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.