Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34002428›Full record

ArticlePsycho-oncology2021

BRCA mutation carriers' perceptions on postmenopausal hormone therapy: An Italian study.

Giovanni Grandi, Valentina Boggio Sola, Laura Cortesi, Angela Toss, Giulia Andrea Giuliani, Maria Chiara Del Savio, Fabio Facchinetti

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psycho-oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05909410 (Perception About Benefits and Risks Related to Combined Hormonal Contraceptives Use in Patients With Lynch Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05909410 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Perception About Benefits and Risks Related to Combined Hormonal Contraceptives Use in Patients With Lynch Syndrome

TypeobservationalSponsorPiazza della Vittoria 14 Studio Medico - Ginecologia e OstetriciaRan2023 to 2023Enrolled180ConditionsLynch Syndrome, ContraceptionArmsSurvey investigating the CHC use and patients' perception about the relationship between CHC and cancer, diseases and symptoms
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Giovanni GrandiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3567-3278
Valentina Boggio SolaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy.
Laura CortesiDepartment of Oncology, Haematology and Respiratory Disease, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Angela TossDepartment of Oncology, Haematology and Respiratory Disease, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Giulia Andrea GiulianiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy.
Maria Chiara Del SavioDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy.
Fabio FacchinettiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy.
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the actual perceptions of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) in BRCA mutation carriers (BRCAmc) in comparison with women from the general population.

methodsQuestionnaire-based study of 83 BRCAmc and a control group of 89 women without a genetic mutation. Perceptions were evaluated by specific questions and Likert scales (-5-+5).

resultsPresent and past users of HT were more frequent in the control group (p = 0.01), with a longer time of use (p = 0.03). The preferred route of administration of HT was 'oral' (54.6%). The most frequently reported adverse effect of HT was venous thrombosis (0.8), while a protective effect on bone health was reported. No noticeable beneficial effects of HT have been recognised for hot flushes (0.2) and vaginal dryness (0.1). The most frequently perceived beneficial and adverse effects of HT were not significantly different between BRCA mutation carriers and controls. The greatest oncological fear was breast cancer (1.0). The protective role of HT on colorectal cancer was not known (0.1). These oncological impacts were mostly overestimated in BRCAmc, however this was not significant. Few BRCAmc would think of taking HT after risk-reducing surgeries.

conclusionsKnowledge of the effects of HT on BRCAmc is relatively poor and they are likely to overstate its negative effects and underestimate its health benefits; however, this is not significant in comparison to the general population. More and better information should be given to BRCAmc to allow them to make informed decisions about the use of HT, especially before undergoing risk-reducing surgeries.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEstrogen Replacement TherapyFemaleGenes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2Hot FlashesHumansItalyMutationPerceptionBRCAbreast cancercanceroncologypostmenopausal hormone therapyrisk-reducing surgeryRRMRRSOside effects

Identifiers

PMID34002428
PMCPMC8518789
OpenAlexW3160690273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.