Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34002347›Full record

ReviewCNS drugs2021

The Evolution of Medication Overuse Headache: History, Pathophysiology and Clinical Update.

Christina Sun-Edelstein, Alan M Rapoport, Wanakorn Rattanawong, Anan Srikiatkhachorn

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in CNS drugs, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Chronic migraine evolution after 3 months from erenumab suspension: real-world-evidence-life data.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Christina Sun-EdelsteinDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, St Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. Christina.Sun-Edelstein@svha.org.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6192-0527
Alan M RapoportDepartment of Neurology, The David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6311-8562
Wanakorn RattanawongDepartment of Medicine, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand.
Anan SrikiatkhachornFaculty of Medicine, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1592-8541
King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang · THThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medication overuse headache (MOH), the development or worsening of chronic headache resulting from frequent and excessive intake of medications used for acute treatment of headache, is a common secondary headache disorder and is associated with significant personal and societal burdens. The plausible physiologic mechanism is that chronic exposure to acute care migraine treatment leads to suppression of endogenous antinociceptive systems, consequently facilitating the trigeminal nociceptive process via up-regulation of the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) system. Recognizing and preventing its development is an integral aspect of migraine management, as medication overuse is a modifiable risk factor in the progression from episodic to chronic migraine. Over the years, MOH has been difficult to treat and has generated much controversy. Ongoing debates exist over the diagnostic criteria and treatment strategies, particularly regarding the roles of formal detoxification and preventive treatment. The arrival of the anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies has also challenged our views of MOH and its treatment. This review outlines the evolution of MOH diagnostic criteria, presents the current understanding of MOH pathogenesis and discusses the debates over its development and treatment. Data on the efficacy of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in the setting of medication overuse is also presented. These results indicate that patients with medication overuse, who are treated with these new medications, may not need to be detoxified in order to treat MOH. In light of these developments, it is likely that in the future MOH will be more readily diagnosed and treatment will result in better outcomes.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideHeadache Disorders, SecondaryHumansMigraine DisordersRisk FactorsAntibodies, MonoclonalCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide

Identifiers

PMID34002347
OpenAlexW3163226770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.