ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2021
Observation of the effect of one-to-one education on high-risk cases of diabetic foot.
Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Health Belief Model Education on Increasing Cognition and Self-Care Behaviour among Elderly Women with Malignant Gynaecological Tumours in Fujian, China.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2021Trial
- Practical guidelines for the prevention and management of diabetic foot disease in China.Burns & trauma · 2025Article
- Research hotspots and trends in nursing for diabetic foot ulcers: A bibliometric analysis from 2013 to 2023.Heliyon · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiabetes is a common chronic disease, and its global incidence is on the rise. The disease is directly attributed to insufficient insulin efficacy/secretion, and patients are often accompanied by multiple complications. Diabetic foot is one of the most common complications of diabetes. Diabetic feet have ulcers and infections, which can eventually lead to amputation. Basic nursing care, such as lowering blood pressure and preventing foot skin infections in clinical nursing work, has positive significance for the prevention and control of diabetic feet.
aimTo explore the positive significance of one-to-one education in high-risk cases of diabetic foot.
methodsThis observation included 98 high-risk cases of diabetic foot in our hospital during the period from August 2017 to October 2019, and these patients were randomly divided into the basic nursing group and the one-to-one education group with 49 patients per group. The basic nursing group only received routine basic nursing, while the one-to-one education group gave patients one-to-one education on the basis of basic nursing. After nursing, the self-care ability and compliance behavior of the two groups were evaluated and compared between these two groups. The knowledge mastery of the patient and the satisfaction of nursing were accounted.
resultsThe assessment results of patients (self-care responsibility, self-care skills, self-concept and self-care knowledge) were significantly higher in the one-to-one education group than in the basic nursing group. The scores of compliance behaviors (foot bathing, shoes and socks selection, sports health care) in the one-to-one education group were significantly higher than those in the basic nursing group. Patients in the one-to-one education group had a significantly higher level of knowledge mastery and satisfaction of nursing than the basic nursing group.
conclusionOne-to-one education for high-risk cases of diabetic foot is helpful to improve the cognition and self-care ability of patients with diabetic foot, to ensure that patients follow the doctor's advice of self-care and to improve their nursing satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.