Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34002113›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2021

Dancing in Your Head: An Interdisciplinary Review.

Andrea Zardi, Edoardo Giovanni Carlotti, Alessandro Pontremoli, Rosalba Morese

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Body Cosmos 2.0: embodied biofeedback interface for dancing.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. One hundred years of neurosciences in the arts and humanities, a bibliometric review.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Online Communication and Body Language.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrea ZardiDepartment of Humanities, School of Human Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Edoardo Giovanni CarlottiDepartment of Humanities, School of Human Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Alessandro PontremoliDepartment of Humanities, School of Human Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Rosalba MoreseFaculty of Communication, Culture and Society, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this review is to highlight the most relevant contributions on dance in neuroscientific research. Neuroscience has analyzed the mirror system through neuroimaging techniques, testing its role in imitative learning, in the recognition of other people's emotions and especially in the understanding of the motor behavior of others. This review analyses the literature related to five general areas: (I) breakthrough studies on the mirror system, and subsequent studies on its involvement in the prediction, the execution, the control of movement, and in the process of "embodied simulation" within the intersubjective relationship; (II) research focused on investigating the neural networks in action observation, and the neural correlates of

Indexed as

action observationaction understandingdanceembodied simulationmirror neuronsmotor expertisemotor imageryneuroaesthetics

Identifiers

PMID34002113
PMCPMC8123236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.