Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34002068›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2022

Modulation of immune responses to vaccination by the microbiota: implications and potential mechanisms.

David J Lynn, Saoirse C Benson, Miriam A Lynn, Bali Pulendran

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05157425 (Efficacy and Safety of a Multistrain Probiotic Formula to Boost the Immune Response to Influenza Virus Vaccination), which is not on this map. Cited by 204 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
204citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05157425 nacompletednot on this map

Efficacy and Safety of a Multistrain Probiotic Formula to Boost the Immune Response to Influenza Virus Vaccination

TypeinterventionalSponsorAB Biotics, SARan2021 to 2022Enrolled140ConditionsInfluenza VaccineArmsFood Supplement, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

204 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 274 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

144 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

David J LynnPrecision Medicine Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. david.lynn@sahmri.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4664-1404
Saoirse C BensonPrecision Medicine Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7345-6576
Miriam A LynnPrecision Medicine Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4300-1380
Bali PulendranStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6517-4333
Flinders University · AUSouth Australian Health and Medical Research Institute · AUStanford University · US

Funding

VACCINE INDUCED IMMUNITY IN THE YOUNG AND AGEDU19AI057266 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Rafi Ahmed · 2003 to 2026
$81.7M
Systems Biological Analysis of Innate and Adaptive Responses to VaccinationU19AI090023 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI AHMED, RAFI, LI, SHUZHAO · 2010 to 2021
$45.0M
MICROBES, DENDRITIC CELL SUBSETS AND T-CELL IMMUNITYR01AI048638 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PULENDRAN, BALI · 2001 to 2024
$4.5M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI048638NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI057266NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI090023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The need for highly effective vaccines that induce robust and long-lasting immunity has never been more apparent. However, for reasons that are still poorly understood, immune responses to vaccination are highly variable between different individuals and different populations. Furthermore, vaccine immunogenicity is frequently suboptimal in the very populations who are at most risk from infectious disease, including infants, the elderly, and those living in low-income and middle-income countries. Although many factors have the potential to influence vaccine immunogenicity and therefore vaccine effectiveness, increasing evidence from clinical studies and animal models now suggests that the composition and function of the gut microbiota are crucial factors modulating immune responses to vaccination. In this Review, we synthesize this evidence, discuss the immunological mechanisms that potentially mediate these effects and consider the potential of microbiota-targeted interventions to optimize vaccine effectiveness.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaVaccinesAnimalsImmunityVaccinationVaccines

Identifiers

PMID34002068
PMCPMC8127454
OpenAlexW3160287149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.