Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34002006›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2021

Concurrent neuroimaging and neurostimulation reveals a causal role for dlPFC in coding of task-relevant information.

Jade B Jackson, Eva Feredoes, Anina N Rich, Michael Lindner, Alexandra Woolgar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Selective Attention and Decision-Making Have Separable Neural Bases in Space and Time.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Prefrontal Cortex Codes Representations of Target Identity and Feature Uncertainty.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jade B JacksonMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. jade.jackson@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9066-2627
Eva FeredoesSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1665-1583
Anina N RichPerception in Action Research Centre, Department of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5702-6450
Michael LindnerSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Alexandra WoolgarMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8453-7424

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/17Medical Research Council SUAG/052/G101400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) is proposed to drive brain-wide focus by biasing processing in favour of task-relevant information. A longstanding debate concerns whether this is achieved through enhancing processing of relevant information and/or by inhibiting irrelevant information. To address this, we applied transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) during fMRI, and tested for causal changes in information coding. Participants attended to one feature, whilst ignoring another feature, of a visual object. If dlPFC is necessary for facilitation, disruptive TMS should decrease coding of attended features. Conversely, if dlPFC is crucial for inhibition, TMS should increase coding of ignored features. Here, we show that TMS decreases coding of relevant information across frontoparietal cortex, and the impact is significantly stronger than any effect on irrelevant information, which is not statistically detectable. This provides causal evidence for a specific role of dlPFC in enhancing task-relevant representations and demonstrates the cognitive-neural insights possible with concurrent TMS-fMRI-MVPA.

Indexed as

AdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuroimagingPrefrontal CortexTask Performance and AnalysisTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34002006
PMCPMC8128861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.