Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34001988›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Intranasal immunization with inactivated chlamydial elementary bodies formulated in VCG-chitosan nanoparticles induces robust immunity against intranasal Chlamydia psittaci challenge.

Zonghui Zuo, Yongjuan Zou, Qiang Li, Yongxia Guo, Tianyuan Zhang, Jie Wu, Cheng He, Francis O Eko

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Virulence · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Emergence Potential ofArchives of Razi Institute · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Recent Advances of Chitosan Formulations in Biomedical Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Zonghui ZuoKey Lab of Animal Epidemiology and Zoonosis, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China.
Yongjuan ZouKey Laboratory of Biopharmaceutical Production and Formulation Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, People's Republic of China.
Qiang LiKey Lab of Animal Epidemiology and Zoonosis, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China.
Yongxia GuoKey Lab of Animal Epidemiology and Zoonosis, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China.
Tianyuan ZhangKey Lab of Animal Epidemiology and Zoonosis, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China.
Jie WuKey Laboratory of Biopharmaceutical Production and Formulation Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, People's Republic of China.
Cheng HeKey Lab of Animal Epidemiology and Zoonosis, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China. hecheng@cau.edu.cn.
Francis O EkoDepartment of Microbiology, Biochemistry and Immunology, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 30310, USA. feko@msm.edu.
China Agricultural University · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNMorehouse School of Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccines based on live attenuated Chlamydia elementary bodies (EBs) can cause disease in vaccinated animals and the comparably safer inactivated whole EBs are only marginally protective. Recent studies show that a vaccine formulation comprising UV-inactivated EBs (EB) and appropriate mucosal delivery systems and/or adjuvants induced significant protective immunity. We tested the hypothesis that intranasal delivery of UV-inactivated C. psittaci EB formulated in Vibrio cholerae ghosts (VCG)-chitosan nanoparticles will induce protective immunity against intranasal challenge in SPF chickens. We first compared the impact of VCG and CpG adjuvants on protective immunity following IN mucosal and IM systemic delivery of EB formulated in chitosan hydrogel/microspheres. Immunologic analysis revealed that IN immunization in the presence of VCG induced higher levels of IFN-γ response than IM delivery or the CpG adjuvanted groups. Also, vaccine efficacy evaluation showed enhanced pharyngeal bacterial clearance and protection against lung lesions with the VCG adjuvanted vaccine formulation, thereby establishing the superior adjuvanticity of VCG over CpG. We next evaluated the impact of different concentrations of VCG on protective immunity following IN mucosal immunization. Interestingly, the adjuvanticity of VCG was concentration-dependent, since protective immunity induced following IN mucosal immunization showed dose-dependent immune responses and protection. These studies reveal that formulation of inactivated chlamydial antigens with adjuvants, such as VCG and chitosan increases their ability to induce protective immune responses against challenge.

Indexed as

Administration, IntranasalAnimalsAntigens, BacterialBacterial VaccinesChickensChitosanChlamydophila psittaciHumansImmunity, MucosalInjections, IntramuscularInterferon-gammaMiceNanoparticlesPsittacosisVibrio choleraeAntigens, BacterialBacterial VaccinesChitosanIFNG protein, mouseInterferon-gamma

Identifiers

PMID34001988
PMCPMC8129140
OpenAlexW3163495699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.