Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34001631›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2021

The Ventral and Dorsal Default Mode Networks Are Dissociably Modulated by the Vividness and Valence of Imagined Events.

Sangil Lee, Trishala Parthasarathi, Joseph W Kable

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. What episodic memory reveals about the default mode network.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Emotional future simulations: neural and cognitive perspectives.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Brain-consistent architecture for imagination.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sangil LeeDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4443-9926
Trishala ParthasarathiDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.
Joseph W KableDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104 kable@psych.upenn.edu.

Funding

Biomedical Image Computing and Informatics ClusterS10OD023495 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVATZIKOS, CHRISTOS · 2017 to 2017
$1.9M
Neural mechanisms underlying changes in preferenceR01DA029149 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KABLE, JOSEPH W · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA029149NIH HHS S10 OD023495
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent work has shown that the brain's default mode network (DMN) is active when people imagine the future. Here, we test in human participants (both sexes) whether future imagination can be decomposed into two dissociable psychological processes linked to different subcomponents of the DMN. While measuring brain activity with fMRI as subjects imagine future events, we manipulate the vividness of these events to modulate the demands for event construction, and we manipulate the valence of these events to modulate the demands for event evaluation. We found that one subcomponent of the DMN, the ventral DMN or medial temporal lobe (MTL) subsystem, responds to the vividness but not the valence of imagined events. In contrast, another subcomponent, the dorsal or core DMN, responds to the valence but not the vividness of imagined events. This separate modifiability of different subcomponents of the DMN by vividness and valence provides strong evidence for a neurocognitive dissociation between (1) the construction of novel, imagined events from individual components from memory and (2) the evaluation of these constructed events as desirable or undesirable.

Indexed as

AdultBrainBrain MappingDefault Mode NetworkFemaleHumansImaginationMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleDMN coredorsal DMNMTL DMNvalenceventral DMNvividness

Identifiers

PMID34001631
PMCPMC8211541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.